Trump 2024 — The second term

[Ingomike]

Trump would be smart to put off the VP pick announcement to keep everyone discussing who it will be. Even the liberal media discussing it is free advertising.

Now you got it right there…

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

“If elected the long assault on the Second Amendment will he not ver….”

I’m sure we can expect more of the same if he gets reelected.

 

[KG1]

Sen. Ted Cruz 'enthusiastically' endorses Donald Trump for president: 'This race is over'

 

[KG1]

Trump would be smart to put off the VP pick announcement to keep everyone discussing who it will be. Even the liberal media discussing it is free advertising.

Including here.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Including here.

Heh...
Yeah but when we're electing octogenarians the VP pick is a bit more...important than when we're electing a 55 year old. The odds of sudden illness, mental decline are one trip and fall away.

 

[Magyars]

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

No.

 

[KLB]

No.

Immunity for things that are part of the job, sure.

Immunity for blatantly illegal , no.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Immunity for things that are part of the job, sure.

Immunity for blatantly illegal , no.

That's not what he's asking for though.

 

[Ingomike]

Immunity for blatantly illegal , no.

What are examples of ”blatantly illegal

“?

 

[Ingomike]

Trump attorneys preview potential defense in classified documents case

Trump's attorneys also said they are looking to obtain communication between the Justice Department and President Joe Biden's associates.

justthenews.com

 

[red_zr24x4]

That's not what he's asking for though.

Wow he told you that?
Next time you talk to him will you get his autograph for me? make it out to Kenny.
just like every other thread and a lot of different posters , you are speculating what he meant unless he told it to you with his own mouth

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Wow he told you that?
Next time you talk to him will you get his autograph for me? make it out to Kenny.
just like every other thread and a lot of different posters , you are speculating what he meant unless he told it to you with his own mouth

Nope. But I read what he said.

 

[red_zr24x4]

I read it too, still not seeing it

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I read it too, still not seeing it

What does "FULL IMMUNITY" mean to you? Maybe it means something to you than it would to others. Qualified immunity is one thing. Full immunity means (and he's mentioned this elsewhere) he wants to to be immune from any sort of accountability, whether his actions were legal or constitutional or not.

 

[KG1]

What are examples of ”blatantly illegal

“?

"insurrection" duh.

 

[Ingomike]

What does "FULL IMMUNITY" mean to you? Maybe it means something to you than it would to others. Qualified immunity is one thing. Full immunity means (and he's mentioned this elsewhere) he wants to to be immune from any sort of accountability, whether his actions were legal or constitutional or not.

I find this topic fascinating, let’s just go to the outlier, what if the President murders someone? Does it matter who? Did obummer not order the murder of Bin Laden?

In looking at this, it is hard. There is a line to define between the explicit and implied in the constitution. Any weakening of constitutional autonomy results in the means for political enemies to take a president down.

I find few who have spent even a few brain cells studying this and mostly a lot of bluster that even pondering this is stupid because they were taught that no one is above the law but that is not clear.

 

[KLB]

What are examples of ”blatantly illegal

“?

Gee let's see. President murders someone, Oversees a drug trafficking ring(not the CIA), etc.

 

[KLB]

I find this topic fascinating, let’s just go to the outlier, what if the President murders someone? Does it matter who? Did obummer not order the murder of Bin Laden?

In looking at this, it is hard. There is a line to define between the explicit and implied in the constitution. Any weakening of constitutional autonomy results in the means for political enemies to take a president down.

I find few who have spent even a few brain cells studying this and mostly a lot of bluster that even pondering this is stupid because they were taught that no one is above the law but that is not clear.

You're take is that the President can murder someone and there is no recourse? I would certainly hope if it was proven while he was in office, that he would be impeached and found guilty. Then he would be tried in a court.

If it was proven after he was out of office, skip to the trial.

 

[jamil]

Not a fan of this myself, but I think it would absolutely draw in voters that otherwise would vote D or not at all. He seems to be something of a crackpot though.

I think a lot of AF leaning people think of RFK as an ally in a sort of enemy of my enemy sort if way. I agree with him on the things that overlap, but he’s not an AF focused dude. He’s anti-establishment. Which is where most of the overlap comes in. But he is a liberal Democrat at heart. He’s not an ally on guns for example.