indiucky
Grandmaster
Nor would I. After Johnson's Alleppo gaffe, I don't have a candidate.
I know someone...He's kind of tacky, a little orange and will leave you somewhere between laughter and tears within the same two minute time frame...
Nor would I. After Johnson's Alleppo gaffe, I don't have a candidate.
Nor would I. After Johnson's Alleppo gaffe, I don't have a candidate.
I'm going to need something stronger than Dr. Pepper...But you can't pull the whistle.....
I'll bring an icy cold Dr. Pepper and some BBQ ribs back to you...Welcome aboard....I have never backed a middle finger before either...Trump is my first one...
FOR THE ONE MILLIONTH TIME: NeverTrump is not pro-Hillary!!!!!!
LOL.......
Look, if you're gonna be a Trump supporter, you can't act like Hillary getting into her SUV.
I didn't say you have smelly feet. You said you smell something...victory? (which doesn't have a biologic smell). I redirected you to something closer to reality.
FOR THE ONE MILLIONTH TIME: NeverTrump is not pro-Hillary!!!!!!
In the politics of yore the challenge was to speak to your base without alienating the rest. I guess that's no longer deemed necessary.
I feel compelled to point out that this gif, combined with printcraft's avatar gif, makes a mind put together a story. But it is a VERY strange story. Boy meets girl. Girl falls for boy. Boy is socially awkward and doesn't understand the significance of girl falling for boy.
It could probably be considered a kind of disturbed Rorschach test.
99.99% of the time, you'd be right. Now with Pence's comment, she comment looks masterful.... Though actually incredible luck. I have no idea why Pence answered that question the way he did. Was he drinking?
FOR THE ONE MILLIONTH TIME: NeverTrump is not pro-Hillary!!!!!!
I'd also warn you that certain search histories can lead to blindness.
Masterful? Not really. The only reason it works out well for Hillary is because the media has her back.
I'm not often one to defend Pence or Trump, but I will defend reality. The press wanted Pence to use Hillary's word. Why? Well, of course that's a loaded question. They can fry him with just about any answer he gives. If he uses Hillary's word to describe Duke, they can make headlines and stories up about Pence using her word to describe a Republican. If he refuses to use the word they want him to use, they can make headlines and stories up that say he won't call David Duke deplorable.
He said, after repeatedly stating that he doesn't agree with Duke and that their campaign wants nothing to do with Duke, that he would not use HER word. He made it clear that the reason he would not use that word has nothing to do with his opinion about Duke, but because it would validate Hillary's use of it. At one point he even said that he could call Duke names that are worse, but he doesn't engage in name calling. That is actually a principled and honorable position. But that's not what the headlines read, because the news didn't tell that part of the story.
There is no answer that Pence could have given for that "gotcha" question that would not have resulted in a "gotcha" answer printed. That has nothing to do with Hillary's mastery, and everything to do with a corrupt political machine working with a corrupt press.
All of this is true and insightful. The only thing I see missing is addressing the question of why it is that anyone who happens to be white is considered to be required to preemptively attack any/all white racists, yet no one ever demanded Obama denounce the NBPP for suppressing the vote with baseball bats or demanded that Obama direct the justice department do it's duty rather than giving it a wink and a nod.
Helping the enemy is helping the enemy. Call it liberal, call it NeverTrump, call it anti-gun, it doesn't really matter what you call it.
Helping the enemy is helping the enemy.
That's not exactly Obama's problem. He can't exactly respond to a question that isn't asked.
I can grok an anti-hillary/anti-politician wave...at least to some degree. But I won't vote for a person I consider to be dishonest and fraudulent in almost everything they have done and in what they say. And yes, Clinton has been dishonest AT TIMES. She has a long public record that can be picked apart. Trump? A real estate developer who doesn't pay his vendors. That's not the person I want to see running anything.
And Indy? It's not fair using The Dude against me. That is an unfair debate tactic! Foul!