Here we go
Scott Walker Says G.O.P. Nominee May Not Be Trump, Cruz or Kasich
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...nominee-may-not-be-trump-cruz-or-kasich/?_r=0
Though it's possible, the headline seems more sensational than the content.
Here we go
Scott Walker Says G.O.P. Nominee May Not Be Trump, Cruz or Kasich
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...nominee-may-not-be-trump-cruz-or-kasich/?_r=0
Hunt down? what possible law could they have broken? It was chalk, it wasn't vandalism...
He should be fired for being an idiot and encouraging idiocy in this students.
Though it's possible, the headline seems more sensational than the content.
I thought I read somewhere that students must get written permission to write things in chalk all over the campus. Especially if they damage the perception of warm and fuzziness within a safe space.
Here we go
Scott Walker Says G.O.P. Nominee May Not Be Trump, Cruz or Kasich
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...nominee-may-not-be-trump-cruz-or-kasich/?_r=0
Seems like a trial balloon to me. Get the idea on the table, see how the winds are blowing and get people used to the idea.View attachment 46261
Probably talking about Rand Paul.
So this is weird..........
Ted Scruz
Probably talking about Rand Paul.
I would jump on that bandwagon in a heartbeat
Sounds good to me, but my guess is that we have a better chance of both of us being beatified in spite of being neither Catholic nor dead than we have of this actually happening.
Just oozes Presidential.
Let's not kid ourselves. The GOP would rather lose than allow Paul to win the presidency as well.
Hey look: it's something GFGT and I agree about with respect to this election.
You contend that he doesn't have a point?
We're not talking about superdelegates here. These are proportionally distributed delegates in a state that Trump won.
But is this a litigation issue? Aren't the delegates allowed to do as they wish?
You contend that he doesn't have a point?
We're not talking about superdelegates here. These are proportionally distributed delegates in a state that Trump won.
This sounds to me like the pile game in cards, where you by one means or other have a card already chosen by the person being played as one of twenty in one of 5 piles of 4 cards each. You tell him to pick two (or three) piles. If he picks the pile containing his card, you keep that group of piles and discard the others. If not, you discard the ones he picked. Either way, you keep the pile with his card. Repeat down to the single pile containing his card. Separate out the 4 cards and do basically the same thing having him pick 2. If he picks his and one other, you keep the ones he picked. If not, you discard the ones he picked. Do the same thing one more time now that you are down to his card and only one other. You correctly recover his card in spite of the fact that he believes that he was controlling the game when in fact you were BSing him into thinking he was in control when he never was in any way shape or form. If we have truly reached this point with elections, it, well, may be time to rethink our approach to selecting government.