http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/03/15/17-3510ebo.pdf. The 9th circus says they got it wrong.
Atleast somebody finally has the guts to dish out a much deserved smackdown. This whole partisan judicial coup thing needs to be dealt with post haste.
Wow. Smacked down by their peers on the 9th circuit. That is bad.
Atleast somebody finally has the guts to dish out a much deserved smackdown. This whole partisan judicial coup thing needs to be dealt with post haste.
Unfortunately, this was just a rebuke from a minority of judges to the majority regarding a decision that still stands.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ation-executive-order/?utm_term=.cd59f63d0808
In other words, the nationalism issue has become a football in a growing class struggle between those who praise tolerance but do not face the pain of being tolerant, and those who see tolerance as the abandonment of all they learned as a child. I began by talking about Hitler, whom no reasonable and decent person wants to emulate. Yet, what made him strong was that the elite held his followers in contempt. They had nowhere else to go, and nothing to lose. Having lost much in World War I and the depression, they had nothing left but pride in being German. And the scorn in which they were held turned nationalism into a monstrosity.
Scorn and contempt are even more powerful a force than poverty. Liberals are sensitive to the scorn directed at immigrants, but rarely to those who must deal with immigration not as a means of moral self-satisfaction, but in daily life. This is not about immigration or free trade. It is about the nation, first loves, and the foundations of liberalism.
It's pretty indicative of what's likely to happen when the appeal gets to them though.
However, the dispute about the revised executive order will likely go up to the Supreme Court (especially if at least one circuit court concludes that the revised order is likewise invalid, perhaps citing the earlier 9th Circuit panel opinion as precedent). And at that point this five-judge dissent will be influential, as a major and detailed argument for the constitutionality of such executive orders.
These two quotes from the article:Husband of Indiana Trump supporter facing deportation Friday - 13 WTHR Indianapolis
Another sympathetic/problematic media report.
"I mean, Roberto has his Social Security card," Helen told affiliate WNDU-TV earlier this month.
Now, the owner of Eddie's Steak Shed in Granger may have to leave the country for nine months until his green card comes through.
These two quotes from the article:
AND
When dealing with immigration stuff, even as little as I have, it is important to suspend a certain amount of disbelief about what happens within the system, at several levels.
People try to shortcut a byzantine system, and that byzantine system can produce inherently contradictory results for someone trying to play it straight.
The odds are actually against you, IMHO.Or, perhaps, what the wife THINKS is HIS social security card, is actually, in fact, someone else's?
ETA: While the SSA might have inadvertently issued him a card in his own name and identity, my money is on the ABOVE... I bet with the odds.
The AP has been reporting on it. This notion of it not being part of whatever narrative is demonstrably untrue.
Ah, so we're critiquing reporting being too slow AND reporting being too fast, depending on the source.How many "extra" days did it take to make their news cycle?
The AP has been reporting on it. This notion of it not being part of whatever narrative is demonstrably untrue.
Maryland high school thrust into immigration debate amid bathroom rape case - Chicago Tribune
His narrative is that they shouldn't be here in the first place, so any crimes they commit, especially heinous ones like this, committed against a CHILD in her SCHOOL, are too many.Plus, POTUS is pushing the narrative that illegals are evil and the MSM reports on that every time he says it.