Positive.
I won't even push your link. But keep looking. I know you'll find it.
Trump is clearly willing to work "across the aisle" to make budget and funding deals to avoid another government shutdown. Deals that don't include funds for the wall.
Trump, Pelosi Reach Budget/Debt Limit Deal
And, despite promising that Mexico would pay for the wall, Trump refused to accept a brokered deal back in the day that would be a compromise, but would fund at least the start of the border wall. I'm sure INGO remembers the government shutdown Trump used to try an leverage money for the wall.
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/10/18258792/trump-border-wall-budget-request-2020
His actions reveal that he would rather avoid any meaningful progress on the border/immigration in favor of keeping it as a wedge issue.
Mind reading optional.
Replacing means there was already a wall there. Not building something new. With money that had been allocated before his emergency declaration.
The Tucson sector, which covers most of Arizona and is almost completely blocked by vehicle and pedestrian fencing, has seen a recent increase in apprehensions. In fiscal 2018, CBP caught about 52,000 people there, including an estimated 5,000 unaccompanied minors.
The sector of the Southwestern border with the fewest apprehensions, on the other hand, has almost no fencing. The Big Bend sector, starting in West Texas and extending about halfway down the state, is the largest individual sector guarded by CBP. The rough terrain of the mountain ranges and the Chihuahuan Desert make it a difficult place to cross. In fiscal 2018, CBP apprehended just 8,000 people there.
Well, he is a cute little tyke.
His parents must have just taken the little guy to the carnival for cotton candy and face painting just before they were kidnapped by ICE.
Well, he is a cute little tyke.
I am sure he is a joy to have around.
It's an interesting premise. If Congress holds the purse strings, and the president asks Congress to pay for something, should if Congress say "no," the president be able to take the money Congress have approved for something and fund the thing Congress has said "no" to?
Remember, it this should be true of whomever is in power.