- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
I thought my words might be misconstrued.
My post was not about Trump or his policies. I only addressed the issue with the power of the POTUS, nothing more, nothing less.
Yes, he's a great president.
This is exactly the problem I was talking about in the context of any POTUS gaining too much power.
Trump may be just fine doing more than two terms as president, but can you say that with absolute certainty about his successor?
I do find the actions of the Democratic party much more disturbing. You seem to be insinuating that this is my preferred party. I assure you it is not.
Most certainly!
Trump had to come to the rescue in part precisely because previous presidents gained ever more power and did not use it wisely.
To conclude, this certainly is an exceptional time, and departures from conventions are meant for such times.
However, I do not see much deliberation in the public square, so to say, about entrusting POTUS (any POTUS) with even more power -- and that is troubling.
I would say that we are thinking the same way. My answer to your last and most important point is that by and large the same owners own the politicians on both sides of the aisle. May I hold up in evidence the notable lack of dissimilarity in practice between Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama, and the other Clinton. They alternated between people they gave lip service and people they irritated, but in practice they all followed the globalist agenda while doing little more than stirring the pot regarding the politically "hot" issues. I would emphasize that the globalist agenda requires the consolidation of power in Washington and OUT of the hands of We the People to whom it rightfully belongs.