The OFFICIAL Trump/HRC/2016 General Election Thread...

[Jludo]

Hahahahhaa, he just lost the Kardashian vote

"Why don’t we fire Khloe? She is a fat piglet. Why did we get the ugly Kardashian?”

Donald Trump Made Nasty Comments About Khloe Kardashian On 'Apprentice,' Staffers Say | Huffington Post

Trump can't afford to lose the reality TV/WWE demo

 

[printcraft]

I think it's high time the White House get some of those Bunga Bunga parties that Italy was so famous for.

They already do but it's just a little different right now.....

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

 

[indiucky]

They already do but it's just a little different right now.....

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

What does a publicity still shot from Top Gun have to do with what we are talking about????

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Back in the day, news outlets would train you to require 2 sources to run a story.

These allegations are usually one, the victim. The damning part is Trump's words in the tape. That's how masterfully this was all done. They have him, on tape, bragging about sexual assault... and suddenly a wave of sexual assault victims come forward.

Especially in the day-and-age where the UVA situation happened... They can take any claim and run with it. If it's fake... who cares? They've just got to push it for another 20-something days. They can worry about lawsuits and retractions after Clinton is sitting in the White House.

I don't mean "masterful" in a positive way. It's just perfectly corrupt. Done in the most excellent manner to change elections.

 

[BugI02]

Everyone who scoffed at the vast right-wing conspiracy should be equally dubious of a vast left-wing conspiracy. IMHO.

You don't think EVERY news organization, except Fox and a few small players, plus the DOJ and the FBI (and God knows who else) amounts to a vast left wing conspiracy. Who else would have to get on board? Is anybody else left?

 

[printcraft]

I had a feeling.

 

[Alpo]

Back in the day, news outlets would train you to require 2 sources to run a story.

These allegations are usually one, the victim. The damning part is Trump's words in the tape. That's how masterfully this was all done. They have him, on tape, bragging about sexual assault... and suddenly a wave of sexual assault victims come forward.

Especially in the day-and-age where the UVA situation happened... They can take any claim and run with it. If it's fake... who cares? They've just got to push it for another 20-something days. They can worry about lawsuits and retractions after Clinton is sitting in the White House.

I don't mean "masterful" in a positive way. It's just perfectly corrupt. Done in the most excellent manner to change elections.

On the other hand, Trump is a slimeball. What goes around comes around.

70 years of doing exactly what you want with no one telling you "no" wreaks havoc on self-restraint.

 

[Tombs]

[video=youtube;GojGTmeHhwE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GojGTmeHhwE[/video]

It still remains mind boggling how many people's brains are completely shut off and ignoring the threat we're facing.

 

[BugI02]

That's not how it happened.

Coverage during and before primary was Neutral-to-Positive. They already covered this in leaked e-mails. Giving him hours and hours of neutral coverage, while giving other candidates none. From day one they built him up to make him the nominee. Then after the primary, the negative coverage kicked in to guarantee Clinton's victory.

Did you forget your boy Cruz was on the same list in that same email? Maybe you thought Jeb! - $150 million for less than 300k votes (0.92%). He could have paid $450 per vote and done better

Marco, who could only win Minnesota and not even his home state? What GOPe juggernaut would you have gotten behind. I can't see you as a Rand Paul supporter AND THAT WAS WHO THE HAG FEARED MOST

Rand would never have toed the Chamber of Commerce line so we wouldn't have been able to have him

 

[T.Lex]

You don't think EVERY news organization, except Fox and a few small players, plus the DOJ and the FBI (and God knows who else) amounts to a vast left wing conspiracy. Who else would have to get on board? Is anybody else left?

The quotes I posted were from the Washington Post, LA Times, and New Yorker. Which of those do you consider as "conservative" as Fox?

(I am still accepting, without conceding, the assertion that there was such a thing as "negative" coverage in the primaries.)

As a different tack (still accepting without conceding the notion that there is a vast left wing conspiracy), do you think it is possible that such a conspiracy would work toward having Republicans nominate the least-liked candidate of them all?

 

[T.Lex]

It still remains mind boggling how many people's brains are completely shut off and ignoring the threat we're facing.

You get used to it after awhile.

Some of us saw the threat back in March.

 

[BugI02]

I think it's high time the White House get some of those Bunga Bunga parties that Italy was so famous for.

I think those are already being held on Epstein's island. After all, wasn't it doinking underage hookers that brought him down? Epstein just likes them REALLY underage

But I think Soros is really our Berlusconi

 

[BugI02]

The quotes I posted were from the Washington Post, LA Times, and New Yorker. Which of those do you consider as "conservative" as Fox?

(I am still accepting, without conceding, the assertion that there was such a thing as "negative" coverage in the primaries.)

As a different tack (still accepting without conceding the notion that there is a vast left wing conspiracy), do you think it is possible that such a conspiracy would work toward having Republicans nominate the least-liked candidate of them all?

Yes, but I didn't see much positive coverage of Jeb! at all

 

[foszoe]

The quotes I posted were from the Washington Post, LA Times, and New Yorker. Which of those do you consider as "conservative" as Fox?

(I am still accepting, without conceding, the assertion that there was such a thing as "negative" coverage in the primaries.)

As a different tack (still accepting without conceding the notion that there is a vast left wing conspiracy), do you think it is possible that such a conspiracy would work toward having Republicans nominate the least-liked candidate of them all?

I don't think it takes a vast conspiracy. I think it's simple, but I am a simple guy.

Democrats can start unified and stay on message.

Republicans can't and are their own worst enemy.

 

[printcraft]

hitlary will be the best friend gun owners ever had, much like obama.........

Wikileaks: PR Firm Seeks Clarification on Hillary's Support of 25% Gun Tax - Breitbart

 

[T.Lex]

Yes, but I didn't see much positive coverage of Jeb! at all

You know you're kinda helping my point, right? With Jebra, the media focused on how unpopular he was. That fed the notion that he was unpopular. And weak.

I don't think it takes a vast conspiracy. I think it's simple, but I am a simple guy.

Democrats can start unified and stay on message.

Republicans can't and are their own worst enemy.

I really don't think it is that simple. The Dems were fractured most of the primary season, too.

I will grant that their centralized system for picking a nominee made sure that their establishment pick got the nod. Our fault, to the extent it is a fault, is to have a more democratic system than the democrats.

Frankly, I would rather have our system than theirs, from a philosophical standpoint.

 

[BugI02]

So if the left is conspiring to help Trump be the nominee and the Russians are conspiring to help Trump be the nominee, are the left and the Russians working together?

 

[T.Lex]

So if the left is conspiring to help Trump be the nominee and the Russians are conspiring to help Trump be the nominee, are the left and the Russians working together?

You tell me.

 

[foszoe]

You know you're kinda helping my point, right? With Jebra, the media focused on how unpopular he was. That fed the notion that he was unpopular. And weak.


I really don't think it is that simple. The Dems were fractured most of the primary season, too.

I will grant that their centralized system for picking a nominee made sure that their establishment pick got the nod. Our fault, to the extent it is a fault, is to have a more democratic system than the democrats.

Frankly, I would rather have our system than theirs, from a philosophical standpoint.

I agree, but on a continuum between conspiracy and self inflicted, I think it's the self inflicted feeding all the necessary ammo to to conspiracy. I admit though that it is just an opinion and is probably driven by so.easy general frustration with this election cycle.

 

[T.Lex]

I agree, but on a continuum between conspiracy and self inflicted, I think it's the self inflicted feeding all the necessary ammo to to conspiracy. I admit though that it is just an opinion and is probably driven by so.easy general frustration with this election cycle.

It is probably worth re-stating that I don't believe in a vast left wing conspiracy. I believe liberal elites like to make money by leveraging controversy to make eyeballs watch shows to watch ads.

Trump indulged them.

Had he had the discipline that many of those early articles suggested, he would be ahead IMHO.