The Nuclear Iran Situation

[Leadeye]

Legacy's are at stake here so get out the US taxpayers checkbook.


In the end they will test a bomb, the Saudis will test a bomb, and American's will pay. All so leadership can look good on tv.

 

[findingZzero]

Mistrust, but verify!
Nowhere in the agreement (understanding) does it say Iran can't buy 10 nukes from Putin.

 

[jamil]

Mistrust, but verify!
Nowhere in the agreement does it say Iran can't buy 10 nukes from Putin.

Or North Korea? But they'll probably want ones that actually work, so Putin.

 

[printcraft]

Mistrust, but verify!
Nowhere in the agreement (understanding) does it say Iran can't buy 10 nukes from Putin.

That would save a lot of testing time. As soon as the sanctions are lifted they will have more cash too.

 

[D-Ric902]

So what does America get out of this.......

headlines

 

[jamil]

So what does America get out of this.......

headlines

Well, at least Indiana isn't in the news while everyone's watching this.

 

[findingZzero]

What are the odds the 2 sides will actually agree to a deal? They have their Ayatollahs. We have ours. If both sides hate the deal isn't that a good thing? Besides, what's the alternative?

Here's my offer. You can have your nukes, but you have to get rid of your Ayatollahs.

 

[jamil]

What are the odds the 2 sides will actually agree to a deal? They have their Ayatollahs. We have ours.

I think their Ayatollahs' beards are longer than ours. So they win.

 

[findingZzero]

I think their Ayatollahs' beards are longer than ours. So they win.

Who knows what they are hiding under there.

 

[jamil]

Who knows what they are hiding under there.

Eh, I'm sure Kerry has that covered. Surely John-boy wouldn't let a nuke hide up in there unchecked. UN inspectors will be checking beards, I'm sure.

 

[D-Ric902]

What are the odds the 2 sides will actually agree to a deal? /QUOTE]

They did. Iran demanded and we agreed.

"peace and headlines and nuance and spin in our time"

 

[ArcadiaGP]

****ing wow.

Pres Obama says Iran will not stockpile materials it needs to build a nuclear weapon. And if Iran cheats, would take a year to build bomb.

Well, there you have it guys, nothing to worry about. He'll almost be out of office anyway.

So when, not if, but when Iran threatens Israel with a nuke... will we have a President strong enough to aid our ally?

 

[ghitch75]

****ing wow.



Well, there you have it guys, nothing to worry about. He'll almost be out of office anyway.

So when, not if, but when Iran threatens Israel with a nuke... will we have a President strong enough to aid our ally?

oh yes and that doesn't count for the stuff they have hidden so 2 to 3 months(if they don't have it already) and they blow up Isreal!!!!!!

nice deal Obuma!!!!!!

 

[printcraft]

****ing wow.

Originally Posted by Mark Knoller
Pres Obama says Iran will not stockpile materials it needs to build a nuclear weapon. And if Iran cheats, would take a year to build bomb.

Well, there you have it guys, nothing to worry about. He'll almost be out of office anyway.

So when, not if, but when Iran threatens Israel with a nuke... will we have a President strong enough to aid our ally?

Wait, wait, wait...... upthread our resident al jazerra affiliate reporters said that Iran was no where near a bomb
and Mossad was even saying they were like 10 years away.... Clearly somebody is full of ****........

 

[findingZzero]

****ing wow.



Well, there you have it guys, nothing to worry about. He'll almost be out of office anyway.

So when, not if, but when Iran threatens Israel with a nuke... will we have a President strong enough to aid our ally?

Nuclear war is bad for business. Iran's Ayatollah isn't stupid. Israel is small, but their nuclear arsenal would devastate Iran. My understanding is that the Ayatollah, surrounded by wars (involving the US and ISIS) needs a nuke to feel safe in a world where once you give up your nukes (Libya) all hell breaks loose. Their nuclear power development is also a source of national pride for their country. They need a secular government there. A stonger middle class will demand more freedom. Lifting the sanctions may help speed this along. If I'm wrong, I'll see you in your bunker.

 

[jamil]

Nuclear war is bad for business. Iran's Ayatollah isn't stupid. Israel is small, but their nuclear arsenal would devastate Iran. My understanding is that the Ayatollah, surrounded by wars (involving the US and ISIS) needs a nuke to feel safe in a world where once you give up your nukes (Libya) all hell breaks loose. Their nuclear power development is also a source of national pride for their country. They need a secular government there. A stonger middle class will demand more freedom. Lifting the sanctions may help speed this along. If I'm wrong, I'll see you in your bunker.

Just like having a long term goal of wiping Israel off the map is only rhetoric to make them feel safe.

 

[findingZzero]

Death to America. Death to Israel. Death to rhetoric.

 

[D-Ric902]

Death to America. Death to Israel.

I thought that was "political rhetoric for local consumption"

 

[mrjarrell]

This is not the final deal, just an agreement on the framework of a future agreement. Getting rid of 2/3 of their enrichment capability is pretty big step. And the PTB will be watching them closely.

John Kerry on Iran nuclear talks: agreement is a 'solid foundation' - live updates | World news | The Guardian

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Oh well that's just lovely:

Iran Accuses U.S. of Lying About New Nuke Agreement | Washington Free Beacon

I was too young to enjoy the Cold War, so this is awesome. Back when Liberals were skeptical of the President...