Kirk Freeman
Grandmaster
He did not endorse her for president, and did not give up on the ticket.
Giving up is the headline from Reason. Giving up is how libertarians are characterizing the Libertarian Party's attempt to elect Hillary.
He did not endorse her for president, and did not give up on the ticket.
No, it's how one author is characterizing Weld, which Weld probably deserves. But it's not exactly what he said.Giving up is the headline from Reason. Giving up is how libertarians are characterizing the Libertarian Party's attempt to elect Hillary.
No, it's how one author is characterizing Weld, which Weld probably deserves. But it's not exactly what he said.
No it is Reason magazine. You know Reason? The flagship of libertarianism. Heard of it before?
The organ of libertarianism isn't pure enough for ya or something?
So the flagship of libertarianism is saying Weld is saying something he really didn't say. That's like Solon saying Bernie Sanders said something he didn't say. Prolly not going well for Democrats if it ever came to that. Sorta lets us know the state of the LP.
Why don't I read Reason? I must not be libertarian enough.
Nice try, again, Kirk.
but who knows what &*%$#@ purity tests are coming later in this thread,
I see Reason is reporting Penn Gillette voted Clinton, even one of the top Libertarians won't vote Libertarian...
Giving up is the headline from Reason. Giving up is how libertarians are characterizing the Libertarian Party's attempt to elect Hillary.
I see Reason is reporting Penn Gillette voted Clinton, even one of the top Libertarians won't vote Libertarian...
I see Reason is reporting Penn Gillette voted Clinton, even one of the top Libertarians won't vote Libertarian...
Everytime I pull the curtain back and reveal the true nature of libertarianism/Libertarian Party someone comes along and says "no, not them, not pure enough."
It's like a running joke on INGO or something.
It's like I can see into the future.
Surely you do not believe the purpose of the Libertarian Party is to elect Libertarians? No one can believe that anymore.
I see Reason is reporting Penn Gillette voted Clinton, even one of the top Libertarians won't vote Libertarian...
So should we vote for the hard core socialist or the drug addled social justice warrior with his gun grabbing, Hillary supporting sidekick?If you all want a 2-party system, then keep behaving like it's normal for people to support their party at all costs, even when the "costs" are Sanders selling out or people getting behind a lying conman.
A dose of history might also be useful. This wasn't a 2-party nation so strictly until a few decades ago. I don't think that change is something to be proud of. I think it's why we have people going to the ballots with perceptibly bad choices.
then keep behaving like it's normal for people to support their party at all costs,
I see Reason is reporting Penn Gillette voted Clinton, even one of the top Libertarians won't vote Libertarian...
He had that sticker on his car for a while.