Did you watch the video or read his response? I think the reality is much different than the headline, and I think his response is honest. As much as he talks about Syria, I don't think he is ignorant of the issue.
they were on a completely different topic when the word "Aleppo" was thrown out.
Gary Johnson: 'What is Aleppo?' - Business Insider
"This morning, I began my day by setting aside any doubt that I'm human. Yes, I understand the dynamics of the Syrian conflict — I talk about them every day," Johnson said in a statement to POLITICO. "But hit with 'What about Aleppo?' I immediately was thinking about an acronym, not the Syrian conflict. I blanked. It happens, and it will happen again during the course of this campaign.
"Can I name every city in Syria? No. Should I have identified Aleppo? Yes. Do I understand its significance? Yes."
Making an issue out of that is about like trying to make an issue out of Hillary's coughing fit yesterday. If either is a long term problem (Johnson's knowledge or Hillary's health), then a broader view will expose that.
"Can I name every city in Syria? No. Should I have identified Aleppo? Yes. Do I understand its significance? Yes."
IDK, I watched the video clip Indy posted, and it does not appear to have been edited in the crucial part. Given your [STRIKE]alibi[/STRIKE] explanation, one would think he would twig as soon as the host says it's in Syria. But it's not until the host mostly completes the statement to the effect that it is the epicenter of the refugee problem that Johnson says he's got it