Again.. "what difference would it make if VUPD had msgd another Mod and said "Ban him" instead of doing it himself?"
You might have a point, if this had been Hornady's first offense... instead of one of MANY
A huge difference. He would have been able to honestly say he didn't mishandle it because he was angry. So this wasn't his first offense, so what? That doesn't change the fact that the wrong person banned him out of spite. That's the point. This isn't the first time that concerns have been raised about how issues were not handled properly. Again, nothing will be done to correct the mistake and the mods will be scratching their heads wondering why people are up in arms the next time an issue comes up.
If my opinion is no longer desired, then I'll ask vupdblue to let me know, and I'll drop it.
A huge difference. He would have been able to honestly say he didn't mishandle it because he was angry.
Roadie is trying to say that he would've been banned anyway. Therefore, it wasn't really out of spite.
Seems simple to me. If he trolls someone else, he's gone. If he trolls a mod, then another mod should deal with it.
The difference is, the other mod isn't reacting out of spite.
Roadie is trying to say that he would've been banned anyway. Therefore, it wasn't really out of spite.
He should have asked another mod to evaluate the situation, not flat-out ban.
4) As we can never convey a philosophy through a few rules, we reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to edit or delete posts and/or to revoke Membership. No Second Chances; No Argument; No Trial; No Way. At best you will receive one warning via PM (Private Message).
If someone punches me on the job and I lock them up for battery, did I do it out of spite?
I'm sure 75% of my posts are reported.
If someone punches me on the job and I lock them up for battery, did I do it out of spite?
He mentioned his comment was out of anger, not the actual banning.If another mod agreed, and I'm sure he would have, and the other mod banned him, then your statement would be valid. Since vupdblue already admitted that he reacted out of anger, it definitely was out of spite.
He mentioned his comment was out of anger, not the actual banning.
And the cycle continues...
And the cycle continues...
First, how would you know he didn't ask other Mods to evaluate?
Second, how would you know WHO banned him if VUPD hadn't admitted to it?
Third, the ban was warranted, period.
We keep getting told we are too harsh, etc, but if you read the Rules, we are actually pretty(very) lenient..
Would you prefer we stick to the "Letter of the Law" as written?
You should call another Officer and ask their opinion, and if warranted, have the other Officer make the arrest..
Ferguson’s law enforcement practices are shaped by the City’s focus on revenue rather than by public safety needs.
Should VUPD unban Horn and then immediately have one of the other mods ban him again...?
To which cycle are you referring? You have two other mods in here saying that the banning was legit. Either of us would've done the same had we saw the posts and the attacks. So, how again does this make it out of spite? He would've been banned anyway.
He mentioned his comment was out of anger, not the actual banning.
To which cycle are you referring? You have two other mods in here saying that the banning was legit. Either of us would've done the same had we saw the posts and the attacks. So, how again does this make it out of spite? He would've been banned anyway.