The guy was a hero this time of year, 22 years ago.Giuliani might as well dig a hole, jump in it and bury himself. They are hammering him up one side and down the other in the courts.
How the mighty have fallen.
The guy was a hero this time of year, 22 years ago.Giuliani might as well dig a hole, jump in it and bury himself. They are hammering him up one side and down the other in the courts.
I assume it's punitive.I do agree with him that the $148 million is ridiculous. Pretty sure those two workers couldn't show $148 million worth of "real" damages.
I'm not saying they're officially counting them early. I'm saying that the data is available and someone has access to it.Well, first you have to prove to me that they are counting early.
Then you have to explain why there exist a way for someone to manipulate them.
No doubt. But it's like a death sentence for jay walking.I assume it's punitive.
You've made to bold assertions:I'm not saying they're officially counting them early. I'm saying that the data is available and someone has access to it.
I'd like to know why there exists a way for someone to manipulate them too. That's my point. Early voting gives them the opportunity. It should not.
Fallen? Or politically hunted? I'm not a fan of Giuliani(sp?). But questioning an election isn't illegal and awarding a sum greater than a person's ability to earn is egregious, disproportionate to any adjudicated crime. Tell the truth, is $140+ million dollars anywhere near appropriate, proprotional, reasonable or just for "defaming" poll workers?How the mighty have fallen.
1. No we don'tAh, no worries. We all do that.
From the AI summarizer searching for early vote counting. With sources linked after.Well, first you have to prove to me that they are counting early.
Then you have to explain why there exist a way for someone to manipulate them.
From the AI summarizer searching for early vote counting. With sources linked after.
As of October 30, 2022, the University of Florida's U.S. Elections Project had counted 20,437,284 early votes, including 12,455,429 mail-in ballots and 7,981,855 in-person ballots, cast. There have been 56,175,142 total mail ballots requested.2 The level of planned early voting measured in the Oct. 3-20 poll still does not reach what Gallup measured in the 2020 presidential election year, during the coronavirus pandemic and before COVID-19 vaccines were available.1 The large states of Texas, Florida, and California lead among the most early votes cast so far, with more than 2 million in each state.2 Montana, Georgia, and Oregon are seeing the highest early voter turnout, relative to their total number of voting-age citizens as estimated by the U.S. Census. In past elections, California and Texas had turnout below the national level.
Early vote count surpasses ordinary midterm turnout
More than 20 million people have already voted in the 2022 general election, according to data analyzed by the University of Florida's U.S. Elections Project.abcnews.go.com
Early Voting Higher Than in Past U.S. Midterms
Four in 10 U.S. registered voters say they have already voted or plan to vote before Election Day, a higher proportion than in prior midterm elections.news.gallup.com
So yes, early voting is counted before the general elections and the results are certainly know by some.
"They counted early votes" meaning, they counted people voting, not who they voted for.From the AI summarizer searching for early vote counting. With sources linked after.
As of October 30, 2022, the University of Florida's U.S. Elections Project had counted 20,437,284 early votes, including 12,455,429 mail-in ballots and 7,981,855 in-person ballots, cast. There have been 56,175,142 total mail ballots requested.2 The level of planned early voting measured in the Oct. 3-20 poll still does not reach what Gallup measured in the 2020 presidential election year, during the coronavirus pandemic and before COVID-19 vaccines were available.1 The large states of Texas, Florida, and California lead among the most early votes cast so far, with more than 2 million in each state.2 Montana, Georgia, and Oregon are seeing the highest early voter turnout, relative to their total number of voting-age citizens as estimated by the U.S. Census. In past elections, California and Texas had turnout below the national level.
Early vote count surpasses ordinary midterm turnout
More than 20 million people have already voted in the 2022 general election, according to data analyzed by the University of Florida's U.S. Elections Project.abcnews.go.com
Early Voting Higher Than in Past U.S. Midterms
Four in 10 U.S. registered voters say they have already voted or plan to vote before Election Day, a higher proportion than in prior midterm elections.news.gallup.com
So yes, early voting is counted before the general elections and the results are certainly know by some.
Thirty-eight states and the Virgin Islands permit election officials to begin processing absentee/mail ballots prior to the election."They counted early votes" meaning, they counted people voting, not who they voted for.
Gallop polled people if they voted early, i.e. they asked them, they didn't get that data from the election officials.
The data on https://rpubs.com/ElectProject/early_vote_2022 allows you to see registered party - which leans Democrat, because Republicans are less likely to vote early... because "reasons".
None of that backs up DoggyDaddy's assertion.
California West's Ann. Cal. Elec. Code § 15101 | Twenty-nine days before Election Day. | A vote count can be accessed or released at 8 p.m. on Election Day. |
NO, NO IT'S NOT.Good enough source for you?
NO, NO IT'S NOT.
We are not talking about mail in or absentee ballots. We are talking about walking into a polling location, and physically voting in person.
NOT THE SAME THING.
An election worker in a western Michigan town has been charged with two felonies after allegedly inserting a flash drive into a computer containing confidential voter registration data during an election in August, local officials said on Wednesday.
Michigan election worker charged with tampering with voting equipment
The election worker in Kent County is accused of inserting a USB drive into a computer containing confidential voter registration data in the Aug. 2 primary, local officials say.www.nbcnews.com
“Our office was made aware this morning that one TSX machine was malfunctioning in the Republican Primary at the Burgess precinct in Lafayette County. We contacted the county. The county dispatched a technician to the precinct and the tablet is being replaced. To our knowledge, only one machine was malfunctioning. Apparently 19 votes were cast prior to the error being detected,” said Anna C. Moak, with the Mississippi Secretary of State’s Office.Malfunctioning voting machine caught on video
Some problems are reported at the polls Tuesday during the primary election runoffs, including a malfunctioning voting machine that was caught on camera.www.wapt.com
Like these? Or are you talking about something other than screwing up the way the machines tally votes? Are you talking about county totals transferred over the internet to a central location?
Oh.An election worker in a western Michigan town has been charged with two felonies after allegedly inserting a flash drive into a computer containing confidential voter registration data during an election in August, local officials said on Wednesday.
...
The election worker was seen by a witness at a precinct in Gaines Township inserting a USB drive into the Electronic Poll Book, the computer used to administer the election. The poll book contains voter registration data, including confidential information barred from release under Michigan laws.
Not even close to what we're talking about.
“Our office was made aware this morning that one TSX machine was malfunctioning in the Republican Primary at the Burgess precinct in Lafayette County. We contacted the county. The county dispatched a technician to the precinct and the tablet is being replaced. To our knowledge, only one machine was malfunctioning. Apparently 19 votes were cast prior to the error being detected,” said Anna C. Moak, with the Mississippi Secretary of State’s Office.
Sounds like ****ty software, not tampering at all.
Many states are giving lists of who has not voted to @jamil blue hairs that give handy’s to get the votes…Well, first you have to prove to me that they are counting early.
Then you have to explain why there exist a way for someone to manipulate them.
I don’t care if you find constitutional Election Day convenient or not. If you want to have your vote counted get your *** to the polls on constitutional Election Day. That simple…You've made to bold assertions:
1. Someone has access to count votes early.
2. Someone can manipulate that count.
Is that conjecture or is it based on facts about the Allen County election systems? If you are aware of such flaws in our system, I would be interested to hear about them. If not, then we can go round and round this tree all day, but I'm not inclined to alter our happy system here in Allen County because of hypotheses.
Many states are giving lists of who has not voted to @jamil blue hairs that give handy’s to get the votes…
There is no specific election day listed in the constitution.I don’t care if you find constitutional Election Day convenient or not. If you want to have your vote counted get your *** to the polls on constitutional Election Day. That simple…
Edit: The vote of those that are out of town on election day are far less critical than the integrity of the election and doing it constitutionally…