The 2020 General Election Thread II

[foszoe]

It wasn’t personal. I like fos. It was no more personal than your message calling out mike, or anyone else’s. If it was read as being personal it shouldn’t have been, it’s just asking for credible sources and not demanding them of others if someone isn’t going to themselves.

Ok. I posted 2 sources. What you are referring to is my statement that without a second source I wouldn't trust anything I read on Gateway Pundit. That was based on my experience reading all the links posted here.

 

[KG1]

This argument is dumb. The story is credible but not the source.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

This argument is dumb. The story is credible but not the source.

Not really. Turned out the NYPOST story about Hunter Biden was credible, but the NYPost is garbage. A source can have content that’s true occasionally. CNN has some truth occasionally, but they’re hardly credible.

 

[KG1]

Not really. Turned out the NYPOST story about Hunter Biden was credible, but the NYPost is garbage. A source can have content that’s true occasionally. CNN has some truth occasionally, but they’re hardly credible.

If the story is true then it's true no matter what the source. That doesn't change. If you have doubts about the truthfullness then confirm the validity through your own preferred source. Simple.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

If the story is true then it's true no matter what the source. That doesn't change. If you have doubts about the truthfullness then confirm the validity through your own preferred source. Simple.

As I pointed out in posts 1891 and 1899, I didn’t argue the content wasn’t true. Just pointing out the source isn’t credible, which, historically on ingo, people have disregarded a story even when true because of the source used. If credible stories are disregarded because of the source that should remain true across the board.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

And honestly I’m over it. It’s been drug out way more than it should’ve been, and made a mountain of a mole hill.

 

[smittygj]

Kind of ironic that on Wikipedia, on today in history

2000 – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bush v. Gore that the recount of ballots cast in Florida for the presidential election be stopped, effectively making George W. Bush the winner.

 

[Ingomike]

"The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot."

T-lex called it right. Wanted to put that out here.

 

[Hawkeye]

So, ... Is this thread finally done?

 

[jsx1043]

So, ... Is this thread finally done?

Yep. And, dare I say, the American experiment as well.

 

[Ingomike]

Ingomike, you’re a good dude. You are generally respectful, always been nice to me, and seem to be an overall good dude. I gotta ask, why are you so unwilling to see the writing on the wall? I can understand thinking the election went the wrong way, or even that there were shenanigans involved. What I can’t understand is why you still think there is a possibility of Trump holding office. I’d it time to retire from the battlefield, and gear up for the next one?

First off, I believe with every fiber of my body that there was and is foreign interference in this election and that is still lurking out there. The Texas case was an unexpected pop up that got shot down. It was a shot at the end zone before settling for overtime.

Are any of the following points not true.

The Dominion voting systems, used in all the battleground states, are very vulnerable to fraud from the operators, to the tabulators, all the way to outside hackers? We were always told they were air-gapped but common everyday folks on the Internet found contracts and proposals that include modems and Internet connections, modems made where? China, by a company China bought a few years ago and where the parts for the entire system are made.

Let's begin here...

 

[smittygj]

So, ... Is this thread finally done?

For the sake or our country, I hope not...

 

[Ingomike]

So, ... Is this thread finally done?

Are we in some kind of a hurry on this? What is the rush? Why can't the cases play out?

In in the end this Hail Mary may be damaging because the twitter brains cannot fathom more than a 280 characters at a time...

 

[Ingomike]

In other news a Michigan judge ordered a forensic exam of Domiion machines and the SS and AG are fighting to keep the results secret. Nothing to see here, move along...

 

[smittygj]

In other news a Michigan judge ordered a forensic exam of Domiion machines and the SS and AG are fighting to keep the results secret. Nothing to see here, move along...

Yep, I read that, and its pretty shady..

 

[Ingomike]

Yep, I read that, and its pretty shady..

And this type of thing keeps happening over and over in this. Why not be open and forthcoming as government should be with all information concerning voting, it should be an open book, no secrets, none. The little boy in the corner doing the funny dance is pooping his pants, we all know it, if the elections people are all pure as driven snow, why do they constantly look like they are pooping their pants?

 

[Bennettjh]

For the sake or our country, I hope not...

When "gun owners" on a gun forum vote for a gun-grabber, you know the country is in sad shape.

 

[wingrider1800]

 

[jwamplerusa]

Yes, this thread is done.

Remember, you can vote your way to communism, but you'll have to fight your way out of it. And you won't have any guns, because the first thing communists do is take your means of defense.

Democrat=anarchist=communist=Marxist=socialist. All those'isms are contrary to the ideals embodied in the Constitution, and the enemy of free and liberty Loving people everywhere.

 

[Ingomike]

An Ingomike situation update.

It was always a long shot that the Texas case would pass the standing part, it was a novel approach, but as T-lex said there were other implications if that box was opened. Originalists were not as likely to go there as if the shoe was on the other foot. I have no doubt the RBG wing would have done it if it was their side.

The various suits in Federal court are losers, federal courts are not there to enforce state law and they are reticent to get involved in election suits.

The suits that generally matter are the state suits brought by the candidate several of which are working their way up. Those will not make it to SCOTUS until they have been through the state system. The real constitutional issues are still there they just have a ways to go until get to the point the final decision looms.

I still hope for more to be revealed soon, we do get more info everyday...