The 2020 General Election Thread II

[Ingomike]

Just look at how IngoMike has reported with glee on almost every case.

That is quite a compliment, thank you! It was not glee, however, it is hope that drives my posts, I want to share my hope with others. However I have just posted the tip of the iceberg that is coming. Thanks again for the compliment...

 

[Alpo]

You've said that for 5 weeks, Mr. Titanic.

It's a good thing those nothingburgers aren't fattening.

 

[buckwacker]

Bug: I'm sure the Colonel has much more to say than just this short summary and the summary isn't worth responding to.

I still believe that Joe Biden will be installed as president on Jan 20 and there isn't any need to game scenarios of an apocalypse.

Weren't you just gaming scenarios if the bad, bad orange man didn't do what you thought he should? I recall something....something...strike....something....something...food running thin...something...no tp.

 

[Alpo]

Buck: You are late to the party and not really contributing. More like kibbitzing. And, while that is your privilege, don't look for me to read or respond further.

 

[Ingomike]

The basis of the Texas suit, from my understanding, is that the states in question used the pandemic to expand things like mail-in voting. My prediction: SCOTUS won’t have the “nads,” and never moves to hear the case.

Actually I believe that the president and possibly SCOTUS are working toward a resolution that does not involve a major government meltdown at one time simultaneously with the election results. So if there is a lack of "nads" it is not pulling the trigger and draining the swamp in one drain

 

[Chewie]

You can theorize to your heart's content. No evidence representing definitive proof was presented. That's a fact. You are welcome to your own theories but not to your own facts.

Ok, if you say so. (Purple required) But you're comment seems to provide evidence of a lack of critical thought processes (just like the msm sheep) and just acceptance of what you are told.

Bit Bleach was an example of fact buried by the msm although I an sure you will claim no relevance to the current situation.

 

[Tombs]

Well you were going on and on about how we're all going to starve if you don't get your way politically.

Perhaps when you've had a chance to clear your mind of the 40+ odd lawsuits that you touted over the last 5 weeks that have all failed and think about what it might mean to the economy if a general strike was called. It doesn't take much to block major roadways (if any of you remember the trucker slowdown during the Carter administration over the 55mph limit). Food supplies start running lean in less than a month. Momma is out of toilet paper again. No school for the kids, online or otherwise. Checks don't get cut by government agencies.

I wouldn't laugh. A general strike is serious business.

 

[Alpo]

Ok, if you say so. (Purple required) But you're comment seems to provide evidence of a lack of critical thought processes (just like the msm sheep) and just acceptance of what you are told.

Have you bothered to read the judges' rulings? I haven't read them all, but I've read some. I've also read extracts.

If you have data not consistent with those facts, present it.

 

[Ingomike]

No, don’t ignore the allegations... make them, and provide proof. The longer we wait, the more likely we are to ignore it. In the words of the old Wendy’s lady, “where’s the beef?”

I think the SCOTUS may have already seen the evidence...

 

[Tombs]

Have you bothered to read the judges' rulings? I haven't read them all, but I've read some. I've also read extracts.

If you have data not consistent with those facts, present it.

https://hereistheevidence.com/

 

[Chewie]

Have you bothered to read the judges' rulings? I haven't read them all, but I've read some. I've also read extracts.

If you have data not consistent with those facts, present it.

Nope, to lazy. You're the presenter of supposed "facts". Do your own deep research, develop hypotheses of your own and either prove or disprove them. That's how you find the truth, not by just accepting what is presented by the msm and their puppets.

 

[buckwacker]

Buck: You are late to the party and not really contributing. More like kibbitzing. And, while that is your privilege, don't look for me to read or respond further.

It's the response one gets when they don't have a response.

 

[Chewie]

It's the response one gets when they don't have a response.

Sounds fair to me.

 

[Ingomike]

Perhaps when you've had a chance to clear your mind of the 40+ odd lawsuits that you touted over the last 5 weeks that have all failed and think about what it might mean to the economy if a general strike was called. It doesn't take much to block major roadways (if any of you remember the trucker slowdown during the Carter administration over the 55mph limit). Food supplies start running lean in less than a month. Momma is out of toilet paper again. No school for the kids, online or otherwise. Checks don't get cut by government agencies.

I wouldn't laugh. A general strike is serious business.

Is this why I keep hearing the President has insurrection documents prepared?

 

[Alpo]

I think the SCOTUS may have already seen the evidence...

I just read one of the filings. Other than an expert witness who swears that the chance of Joe Biden winning those states to be 10 quadrillion to one, I didn't see any "evidence" and since the filings represent the entirety of what is in the hands of SCOTUS, I don't believe you are correct.

 

[buckwacker]

I just read one of the filings. Other than an expert witness who swears that the chance of Joe Biden winning those states to be 10 quadrillion to one, I didn't see any "evidence" and since the filings represent the entirety of what is in the hands of SCOTUS, I don't believe you are correct.

So do you believe this election was clean?

 

[Alpo]

Nope, to lazy. You're the presenter of supposed "facts". Do your own deep research, develop hypotheses of your own and either prove or disprove them. That's how you find the truth, not by just accepting what is presented by the msm and their puppets.

Thank you for telling me how I should proceed. That seems to be a trend with republicans.

The court cases have determined the adequacy of the complaints. They are inadequate. One does not need a deep dive to see that claims made by bloggers or gatewaypundit or Guilian/Ellis/Powell outside of court rarely hold up in front of a judge.

I don't need to prove Joe Biden won the election. State Governors and Secretaries of state certify the results.

 

[Alpo]

Is this why I keep hearing the President has insurrection documents prepared?

You seem to hear alot of things, Mike. Lately, most of them don't seem to be factual.

 

[Tombs]

Thank you for telling me how I should proceed. That seems to be a trend with republicans.

The court cases have determined the adequacy of the complaints. They are inadequate. One does not need a deep dive to see that claims made by bloggers or gatewaypundit or Guilian/Ellis/Powell outside of court rarely hold up in front of a judge.

I don't need to prove Joe Biden won the election. State Governors and Secretaries of state certify the results.

Hard to say a court case has any legitimacy when they block an evidentiary hearing, then proceed to claim a "lack of evidence."

Almost like no low level judge is willing to risk their career over this, and it will have to be settled higher up the chain.

 

[Alpo]

Is that what happened? You've read the court transcripts?