I need a new sig line.I nominate this for the INGO Hall of Fame. It has to be one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on this forum.
I need a new sig line.I nominate this for the INGO Hall of Fame. It has to be one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on this forum.
You have a habit of using words like "fact" and "proven" when you are actually discussing your opinion. You're very obviously entitled to that opinion and you are also free to attempt to sway others to agree with your opinion. But, the words fact and opinion are not interchangeable regardless of how often or how vociferously you proclaim your opinion as fact.
I nominate this for the INGO Hall of Fame. It has to be one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on this forum.
No worries I'm sure the White House will come up with something. They always have, even when they have to lie, backtrack, change their story, or then eventually tell the truth when the leak comes out. Fact is he's reactive and he does a lot of things without thinking first.
I nominate this for the INGO Hall of Fame. It has to be one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on this forum.
I miss almrjarrel and I am so glad we got alDddrees to fill his shoes...It's beautiful man...I remember mrjarrel would use "sigh" the way Dddrees uses "lol"...Good times...Good times....
It's almost like he never left.
No worries I'm sure the White House will come up with something. They always have, even when they have to lie, backtrack, change their story, or then eventually tell the truth when the leak comes out. Fact is he's reactive and he does a lot of things without thinking first.
Can you say credibility? Because Trump and the White House certainly don't have any. FACT!!
Well. Except at least with almrjarrel the grammar was better. But then his skin was thinner. He sure got himself worked up over just words.
Wait. I thought we were talking about climate change. You were just about to answer my question about who the 97% are, what are their credentials, what exactly do they agree on, and how it was determined that they agreed on it. I'll wait.
Wait. I thought we were talking about climate change. You were just about to answer my question about who the 97% are, what are their credentials, what exactly do they agree on, and how it was determined that they agreed on it. I'll wait.
Ah, you missed the other discussion. Oh what a shame.
Wait. I thought we were talking about climate change. You were just about to answer my question about who the 97% are, what are their credentials, what exactly do they agree on, and how it was determined that they agreed on it. I'll wait.
Mr. Rodgers agrees with your side probably. Cite him this time and we'll do all again.
This is what I've found so far.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/arti...-consensus-on-climate-change-it-s-complicated
Can we just call you Mr.jamil? It's kind of the same thing...
So over 66% expressed no position at all.
Sure. I kinda like that.
But I'd prefer, "lord jamil"