Okay. First it was mom's basement, and then you find out mom's been dead for a quarter century, now you're going "old" with Ensure? I'm sorry. I'm not quite THAT old yet. Perhaps you can scour the playground for some more relevant material.
Anyway, let's go through this.
That's a lot of work. So much that it sounds like you're trying to assign busywork. Kind of like a filibustering. How about you just explain how your actual position on it differs from Johnson's? But be careful to be consistent with your other posts. Someone may find that juice worth the squeeze to spend the time researching it.
The Kut Uncertainty Principle requires that MrJ's precise position on a given subject can never be known, so that his positions are not determinate and Quantum Wiggle Room is always available if he gets boxed in by logic/his previous posts
And knuckle dragging? C'mon man. Really? Regurgitating tired old material from the progressive socialist playbook isn't the way to convince me you're not one of them.
WTF? Is there even an actual, solid position there somewhere? Nevermind. It breaks a fundamental principle that the government shouldn't have the power to take the money I earn and give it to other people. The merits are irrelevant. I just can't support that. Mine may be an idealistic position, but I think it's consistent with principles of individual liberty. I think wealth redistribution IS a principle of progressive socialism.
So, you DO admit that I'm right, that you have more contempt for Republicans than you do for Democrats. Okay. I'm clear on that then.
Hmmmmm
Kut(MrJ) or MrJ(Kut)
Brain. Goes. Pow.
