Right, they have to have employees watch everything, and have insurance to cover the worst. The chose to charge non members a fee. No biggie…If they allow a drunk on the range, they are liable.
Right, they have to have employees watch everything, and have insurance to cover the worst. The chose to charge non members a fee. No biggie…If they allow a drunk on the range, they are liable.
Ah, I see. Yeah I have paid that twice since I started shooting there with a couple friends. I really didn't know it was specifically for the Hold Harmless. I just figured it was some kind of revenue generation charge to keep me in their system.$5 a year. I know, I know. But it’s the principle
It is not a secret charge. It is posted on their website. What principal was violated?$5 a year. I know, I know. But it’s the principle
That’s not what an indemnity release is about. There is a difference between liability insurance and indemnification. Lookm up. You may learn something.Right, they have to have employees watch everything, and have insurance to cover the worst. The chose to charge non members a fee. No biggie…
Nope... every time you go to Kroger they hit you with a surcharge for using a credit card - even when you pay with cash.Oops, I forgot…everytime I go to Kroger they hit me with surcharge for insurance and attorney costs.
Who needs enemies to blow up the gun cause? Our own will do it for them.You're not alone in your opinions, @Johwar. I'm glad SPB is an option for folks ... it's just definitely not even close to the best option. And what's a gun forum good for if not voicing our opinions on gun stuff??
Now mention something bad about the NRA and watch someone's head really blow up...
Who knows, it is in the total fee, so who cares? Should SPB just raise daily range fees $5 a day rather than a once a year fee of $5?By the way, how much do you pay at Kings Island to release them from any responsibility except for negligence?
Why did you feel the need to bash them in a forum, that is not just choosing to not pay a phony surcharge…
He is free to do so, it is just not a smart move to blast a business that puts ranges in cities so more have access to shoot than just rural gun owners over $5.He's free to highlight ****** business practices that he finds objectionable.
I also don't know who do you think you are to **** on a member here for that.
Who needs enemies to blow up the gun cause? Our own will do it for them.
He is free to do so, it is just not a smart move to blast a business that puts ranges in cities so more have access to shoot than just rural gun owners over $5.
I am equally free to highlight how it damages those that support shooting sports…
No it did not. I posted about it in one of the linked threads. When the salesman asked for my ID, I asked him why? He stated that their policy is to scan a government ID for all transactions. As he was saying this, I was holding a $10 bill in my hand for a $6 transaction. His smug attitude pissed me off and I firmly replied "Nope", left the item on the counter and walked out.A firm “no” and here is my cash did not work?
1. I don't recall anyone granting you the sole knowledge of what is or isn't a smart move.
2. Shoot Point Blank doesn't support the shooting sports. When was the last time they held an IDPA match? A USPSA match? A GSSF match? ANY sport shooting event? They don't even allow you to work on the basics you need for sport or self defense with a handgun, like drawing, target transitions, or rapid fire.
They, like almost all indoor ranges, are exclusively a revenue generator for the owner (not that I object to that in principle). What they are NOT are a supporter of the shooting sports or the right to keep and bear arms. At least not until they actually DO something more than putting up Grunt Style and Black Rifle Coffee posters on the wall.