Seven Felony Convictions and Deported Five Times.

[Sylvain]

Reject the jury's decision and execute him!

Take him to 36,000 feet over Juarez and drop him out the door without a chute.

I knew someone would come up with the non-purple version.

But nobody can even spell trebuchet

You keep spelling it right.

 

[Alpo]

I knew someone would come up with the non-purple version.



You keep spelling it right.

Why would I need purple? I'm serious.

 

[Sylvain]

Why would I need purple? I'm serious.

I know you are.

 

[churchmouse]

I knew someone would come up with the non-purple version.



You keep spelling it right.

I knew I would get somebody with that....

 

[churchmouse]

I'll be kind. Give him a pilot's bail out rig. Its got a small 16-20' parachute in it. 24-28' was the standard size of conventional sport parachutes back in the day and those thumped you in good requiring a Parachute Landing Fall and/or boots with ankle protection to save your ankles. "A bail out rig will save your life." Notice they didnt say anything about walking away from it. They are small so they dont get in the pilot's way and can be packed into a small area. But you tend to have to be carried away.

Interesting.

 

[2ADMNLOVER]

Why would I need purple? I'm serious.

Apparently laws , jails and deportations don't work , your way seems cheaper and more effective .

 

[churchmouse]

Apparently laws , jails and deportations don't work , your way seems cheaper and more effective .

And if the transport is big enough do multiples.

 

[printcraft]

Apparently laws , jails and deportations don't work , your way seems cheaper and more effective .

It has the effect of a permanent solution to the reoccurring problem.

And for the record, I don't agree with Alpo on this.










38,000 feet minimum altitude.

 

[cerebus85]

I think we all understand what WE want to do. Just think how the family of this girl must feel. This should have been a simple conviction over a senseless crime. There are so many reasons why this guy shouldn't have even been near this woman. And those who will never feel the loss the family has are the ones who want to cry about "civil rights" and "sanctuary" to immigrants who by most accounts do not commit crimes. However this was a completely avoidable death. there was a simple solution. the state of calif keeps sticking its hand out where it doesn't belong trying to give it away with one hand and silence with the other and this time it got bit. the only problem is the only one who feels the bite is this girl and her family.

 

[Libertarian01]

I think the underlying anger is this douche bag should not even be here. They come and go as they please. If the deportations would stick she would be alive.....Yes, launch his ass "Over" the Rio Grande. Maybe it will stick this time and he will only hurt people in his own country.

This I agree with. We have become a welfare state and with that have a vested interest in controlling who comes and goes through our borders.

Doug

 

[Kutnupe14]

Why would I need purple? I'm serious.

For the crimes of an unintentional killing and illegally crossing the border?

 

[Beowulf]

I get that everyone is all riled up here, but it sounds like the prosecutors screwed the pooch on this. Sure, the guy shouldn't have even been walking around, but the fact that they bowed to political pressure and overcharged ended up with this acquittal (and by the way, the guy isn't out free, he's serving time for illegal possession of a firearm with a felony conviction).

From this article: Kate Steinle verdict reignites illegal immigration firestorm
San Jose defense attorney Dennis Alan Lempert said the prosecution should have pursued a charge of negligent discharge of a weapon rather than murder in the first- or second-degree and involuntary manslaughter.
“The notion that it was an intentional shot to kill somebody belies credulity,” said Lempert, a former reserve officer with the Los Gatos police, noting that the bullet ricocheted off the pavement, ultimately traveling 200 feet — the equivalent of more than 10 lanes of traffic. “But the pressure on the prosecution was enormous.”

So, if that's correct, this certainly wasn't an intentional shooting... though I would argue this seems like it should be a clear case of Involuntary Manslaughter (but I'm not lawyer), since the "misfire" happened while he was illegal in possession of a gun. But maybe simple illegal possession isn't considered enough of a predicate crime to shift this to Involuntary Manslaughter.

 

[Alpo]

For the crimes of an unintentional killing and illegally crossing the border?

And dealing dope and being a general over and under douchebag?

Yeah.

And they don't have to cross a border. I'd be glad to fill the plane with our local douchebags as well.

 

[Kutnupe14]

And dealing dope and being a general over and under douchebag?

Yeah.

And they don't have to cross a border. I'd be glad to fill the plane with our local douchebags as well.

I can at least appreciate the consistency, and blind application, if not the penalty.

 

[Sylvain]

And dealing dope and being a general over and under douchebag?

Yeah.

And they don't have to cross a border. I'd be glad to fill the plane with our local douchebags as well.

Should people get shot after their 5th speeding ticket as well?

Because if not they will just keep speeding since they clearly never learn from their mistakes.

 

[Alpo]

Oh you French! You have such savoir faire. It is only in your colonies where you executed people.

 

[churchmouse]

I get that everyone is all riled up here, but it sounds like the prosecutors screwed the pooch on this. Sure, the guy shouldn't have even been walking around, but the fact that they bowed to political pressure and overcharged ended up with this acquittal (and by the way, the guy isn't out free, he's serving time for illegal possession of a firearm with a felony conviction).

From this article: Kate Steinle verdict reignites illegal immigration firestorm
San Jose defense attorney Dennis Alan Lempert said the prosecution should have pursued a charge of negligent discharge of a weapon rather than murder in the first- or second-degree and involuntary manslaughter.
“The notion that it was an intentional shot to kill somebody belies credulity,” said Lempert, a former reserve officer with the Los Gatos police, noting that the bullet ricocheted off the pavement, ultimately traveling 200 feet — the equivalent of more than 10 lanes of traffic. “But the pressure on the prosecution was enormous.”

So, if that's correct, this certainly wasn't an intentional shooting... though I would argue this seems like it should be a clear case of Involuntary Manslaughter (but I'm not lawyer), since the "misfire" happened while he was illegal in possession of a gun. But maybe simple illegal possession isn't considered enough of a predicate crime to shift this to Involuntary Manslaughter.

Can we consider the fact he was not supposed to even be here. Ever. That should bear some weight in all of this.

You are correct. But "Riled" up does not cover it.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Oh you French! You have such savoir faire. It is only in your colonies where you executed people.

Uh, guillotine... last used 1977.

 

[Sylvain]

Oh you French! You have such savoir faire. It is only in your colonies where you executed people.

We also used to burn witches and heretics during the Middle Ages.
Surprisingly enough in today's world it's no longer cool to burn people alive based on their religious beliefs.
Just like it's not cool to advocate killing someone who was found not guilty by a jury.

 

[churchmouse]

Uh, guillotine... last used 1977.

Did you spell that correctly.