Oh, probably not now, and probably not like this, but only sitcom characters have their lives return to status quo ante at the end of the show every time. There are people on this board who remember when the flag didn't have fifty stars on it, and I wouldn't be shocked if it has a different number by the time I get planted in the ground.
We've had states try to secede before and we'll have them secede again.
I'm sure some Roman senator sat on the veranda of his villa in Eburacum and pointed out to his friend making crazy secessionist noises that Britain had been part of the Empire for over three hundred years and always would be and this talk of pulling the legions back to Rome was just silliness.
No, we won't. The economics of it, kills the idea.
What nations would trade with such states?
How would they defend themselves?
Where would the money come from for local infrastructe?
What businesses would find, being in those states, beneficial, knowing that if they do business there, they WON'T be doing business with the rest of the US?
Indiana has no port to speak of and would have to cross foreign land or airspace to export her products. That alone would render secession economically stupid on a monumental scale.
A state seceding is like a 12y/o kid saying he wants to leave the family.
No, we won't. The economics of it, kills the idea.
What nations would trade with such states?
How would they defend themselves?
Where would the money come from for local infrastructe?
What businesses would find, being in those states, beneficial, knowing that if they do business there, they WON'T be doing business with the rest of the US?
So you are saying that the United States of America is going to last, just like it is, until the heat death of the universe? Wow. Just wow.
They won't have to fund the coming bailout of California and Illinois, which is why Obama ran in 2008 in the first place. They knew in the 80's they would be insolvent now, the Actuaries told them this. The Daley's NEED the money.What businesses would find, being in those states, beneficial, knowing that if they do business there, they WON'T be doing business with the rest of the US?
They won't have to fund the coming bailout of California and Illinois, which is why Obama ran in 2008 in the first place. They knew in the 80's they would be insolvent now, the Actuaries told them this. The Daley's NEED the money.
So really, it is a cost savings. Kind of like taxation without representation. People get pissed when you mess with their kids or their rice bowl.
Also, longer lasting countries, society's, cultures tend to be of the same mind, spirit, religion and color.
To answer your first question.....Texas (in 2009) has the 14th largest economy in the world, ahead of Australia, Mexico, South Korea, etc. I think plenty of nations would trade with them.
Texas economy ranking in the world - Texas Economy | EconPost
Third question, the same way it does now. Taxes.
Fourth Question, well, Texas has a lot of the "black gold"....I doubt the US would cut them off completely.
As far as defending themselves....doesn't "every" Texan carry a gun? :P
I only use Texas as an example because it would be the only state I would think that could pull it off if it were allowed.
20 states have current sucession petitions in process. See the map and source article below:
Image - TinyPic - Free Image Hosting, Photo Sharing & Video Hosting
White House website deluged with secession petitions from 20 states | The Daily Caller
I am not sure why if a group a states peacefully seceded it would necessarily stop trade with other states. There are a lot of assumptions on both sides.
That pesky Constitution kinda throws a wrench in the works. States can't trade independently without federal approval.