Just out of curiosity, why was this questioned asked of Sanders in the first place? Just a stupid question altogether.
I would but I'm not feeling the guilt right now. It wouldn't be genuine.Go ahead. You start.
Maybe telling millions of innocent people that they owe an apology isn't going to heal the nation after all.
I would but I'm not feeling the guilt right now. It wouldn't be genuine.
When last I checked, even my little podunk town of nowheresville, Indiana of 10,000 or so has a memorial to those who died fighting in the Civil War. Apologies and payments have been rendered in full already.
Not the people, the enduring idea of the country. No one is asking for any individual's apology, just the official recognition, that under the nation's flag things occurred that tarnished its promise to all men. I'm not apologizing to myself, and I don't expect other living Americans to apologize either. But the nation, if one views it as a perpetual entity, could.
I'm waiting for Apple to apologize to the Chinese.
This argument seems to be based on the assumption that this national entity has never apologized. In reality, there have been many, many apologies. There were some very official apologies made just in my recent memory.
* * *
S.Con.Res. 26 (111th): Resolution apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African Americans (2009)
H.Res. 194 (110th): Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans (2007)
S.Res. 39 (109th): Lynching Victims Senate Apology resolution (2005)
"Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were wrong in that." -- President Bill Clinton (1998)
* * *
These are only a few recent, official, federal apologies. There were also many, many other apologies from the states, various politicians, and celebrities (all of whom are part of the national entity). And let's not overlook that the USA has also instituted numerous pieces of apologetic legislation, including race-based scholarships, affirmative action in the workforce, anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws, and more.
Sanders himself was one of the co-sponsors one of those official apologies, and still he says that "we" need to apologize. To continue to demand an apology is to reject the apologies that have already been issued (even his own). What does the final, acceptable apology look like? Maybe its time for the apologies to finally be accepted.
This argument seems to be based on the assumption that this national entity has never apologized. In reality, there have been many, many apologies. There were some very official apologies made just in my recent memory.
* * *
S.Con.Res. 26 (111th): Resolution apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African Americans (2009)
H.Res. 194 (110th): Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans (2007)
S.Res. 39 (109th): Lynching Victims Senate Apology resolution (2005)
"Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were wrong in that." -- President Bill Clinton (1998)
* * *
These are only a few recent, official, federal apologies. There were also many, many other apologies from the states, various politicians, and celebrities (all of whom are part of the national entity). And let's not overlook that the USA has also instituted numerous pieces of apologetic legislation, including race-based scholarships, affirmative action in the workforce, anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws, and more.
Sanders himself was one of the co-sponsors one of those official apologies, and still he says that "we" need to apologize. To continue to demand an apology is to reject the apologies that have already been issued (even his own). What does the final, acceptable apology look like? Maybe its time for the apologies to finally be accepted.
This argument seems to be based on the assumption that this national entity has never apologized. In reality, there have been many, many apologies. There were some very official apologies made just in my recent memory.
* * *
S.Con.Res. 26 (111th): Resolution apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African Americans (2009)
H.Res. 194 (110th): Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans (2007)
S.Res. 39 (109th): Lynching Victims Senate Apology resolution (2005)
"Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were wrong in that." -- President Bill Clinton (1998)
* * *
These are only a few recent, official, federal apologies. There were also many, many other apologies from the states, various politicians, and celebrities (all of whom are part of the national entity). And let's not overlook that the USA has also instituted numerous pieces of apologetic legislation, including race-based scholarships, affirmative action in the workforce, anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws, and more.
Sanders himself was one of the co-sponsors one of those official apologies, and still he says that "we" need to apologize. To continue to demand an apology is to reject the apologies that have already been issued (even his own). What does the final, acceptable apology look like? Maybe its time for the apologies to finally be accepted.
So congress collectively agreed with these resolutions?
Kut (knows the answer)