Sanders: 'We have got to apologize for slavery

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Just out of curiosity, why was this questioned asked of Sanders in the first place? Just a stupid question altogether.
     

    Woobie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 19, 2014
    7,197
    63
    Losantville
    Just out of curiosity, why was this questioned asked of Sanders in the first place? Just a stupid question altogether.

    Yeah, I think Alpo brought that up. I said I thought it was dumb of Sanders to bring the whole thing up, and Alpo pointed out he was just answering the reporter's dumb question.
     

    Libertarian01

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jan 12, 2009
    6,019
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Maybe it would be best if our President apologized to EVERY group our country has ever wronged.

    Get it all out in the open. Own it. Show remorse for it. Then, move on.

    Slavery, post slavery racism up to and including the 1950's, the oppression of women's right to vote, the treatment of native American Indians, child labor, treatment of dissenters in WWI, the treatment of American citizens and their families by McCarthy's UnAmerican Activities Committee, agent orange, lack of good gear for soldiers in Iraq, and on and on and on the list could go.

    Air ALL of our dirty laundry. Face our good with our bad.

    As a nation we would lose no money. It would violate no treaties. It wouldn't cost us a single job. It would address every group that was wronged by our country. Then no one could say we were in denial, or sticking our head in the sand. The only real harm it would do is to some folks ego. I would be OK with that.

    Think of it this way, even though many of us weren't alive or of voting age (ie. with power) when many of these wrongs occurred, we are still in some way responsible for them. If I buy stock in a company that hurt someone before I bought the stock, I still pay for the mistakes of that company even though I wasn't a shareholder who could vote at the time. My stock value still takes a hit for damages done maybe before I was even born. It may not be fair but it is how the world works.

    The way I see it the sooner we get it done the sooner we can move on and stop rehashing olde issues. They will truly become history.

    Just a thought...

    Regards,

    Doug
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Maybe telling millions of innocent people that they owe an apology isn't going to heal the nation after all.

    Not the people, the enduring idea of the country. No one is asking for any individual's apology, just the official recognition, that under the nation's flag things occurred that tarnished its promise to all men. I'm not apologizing to myself, and I don't expect other living Americans to apologize either. But the nation, if one views it as a perpetual entity, could.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    When last I checked, even my little podunk town of nowheresville, Indiana of 10,000 or so has a memorial to those who died fighting in the Civil War. Apologies and payments have been rendered in full already.


    To who?

    Edit: and fyi, you bring up an excellent point.... if one believes the Civil War was fought over slavery
     
    Last edited:

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    Not the people, the enduring idea of the country. No one is asking for any individual's apology, just the official recognition, that under the nation's flag things occurred that tarnished its promise to all men. I'm not apologizing to myself, and I don't expect other living Americans to apologize either. But the nation, if one views it as a perpetual entity, could.

    This argument seems to be based on the assumption that this national entity has never apologized. In reality, there have been many, many apologies. There were some very official apologies made just in my recent memory.

    * * *
    S.Con.Res. 26 (111th): Resolution apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African Americans (2009)

    H.Res. 194 (110th): Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans (2007)

    S.Res. 39 (109th): Lynching Victims Senate Apology resolution (2005)

    "Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were wrong in that." -- President Bill Clinton (1998)

    * * *

    These are only a few recent, official, federal apologies. There were also many, many other apologies from the states, various politicians, and celebrities (all of whom are part of the national entity). And let's not overlook that the USA has also instituted numerous pieces of apologetic legislation, including race-based scholarships, affirmative action in the workforce, anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws, and more.

    Sanders himself was one of the co-sponsors one of those official apologies, and still he says that "we" need to apologize. To continue to demand an apology is to reject the apologies that have already been issued (even his own). What does the final, acceptable apology look like? Maybe its time for the apologies to finally be accepted.
     
    Last edited:

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    26,157
    149
    In light of rambone's post it would seem plausible that Sander's call for another apology could be construed as vote pandering.
     

    cce1302

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 26, 2008
    3,397
    48
    Back down south
    tumblr_inline_mu6ho7gSLy1rn5tu3.gif

    Should have waited 2 weeks to edit your post. You might have come up with something better.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,262
    113
    Gtown-ish
    The national healing that ensued after each aplogy is not astonishingly absent. It's just absent. There are reasons for that. 1) the apologies were empty because a nation can't apologize in that sense. 2) there's no political value in feeling satisfied.

    This argument seems to be based on the assumption that this national entity has never apologized. In reality, there have been many, many apologies. There were some very official apologies made just in my recent memory.

    * * *
    S.Con.Res. 26 (111th): Resolution apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African Americans (2009)

    H.Res. 194 (110th): Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans (2007)

    S.Res. 39 (109th): Lynching Victims Senate Apology resolution (2005)

    "Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were wrong in that." -- President Bill Clinton (1998)

    * * *

    These are only a few recent, official, federal apologies. There were also many, many other apologies from the states, various politicians, and celebrities (all of whom are part of the national entity). And let's not overlook that the USA has also instituted numerous pieces of apologetic legislation, including race-based scholarships, affirmative action in the workforce, anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws, and more.

    Sanders himself was one of the co-sponsors one of those official apologies, and still he says that "we" need to apologize. To continue to demand an apology is to reject the apologies that have already been issued (even his own). What does the final, acceptable apology look like? Maybe its time for the apologies to finally be accepted.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    This argument seems to be based on the assumption that this national entity has never apologized. In reality, there have been many, many apologies. There were some very official apologies made just in my recent memory.

    * * *
    S.Con.Res. 26 (111th): Resolution apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African Americans (2009)

    H.Res. 194 (110th): Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans (2007)

    S.Res. 39 (109th): Lynching Victims Senate Apology resolution (2005)

    "Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were wrong in that." -- President Bill Clinton (1998)

    * * *

    These are only a few recent, official, federal apologies. There were also many, many other apologies from the states, various politicians, and celebrities (all of whom are part of the national entity). And let's not overlook that the USA has also instituted numerous pieces of apologetic legislation, including race-based scholarships, affirmative action in the workforce, anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws, and more.

    Sanders himself was one of the co-sponsors one of those official apologies, and still he says that "we" need to apologize. To continue to demand an apology is to reject the apologies that have already been issued (even his own). What does the final, acceptable apology look like? Maybe its time for the apologies to finally be accepted.

    So congress collectively agreed with these resolutions?

    Kut (knows the answer)
     

    Expat

    Pdub
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Feb 27, 2010
    113,928
    113
    Michiana
    This argument seems to be based on the assumption that this national entity has never apologized. In reality, there have been many, many apologies. There were some very official apologies made just in my recent memory.

    * * *
    S.Con.Res. 26 (111th): Resolution apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African Americans (2009)

    H.Res. 194 (110th): Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans (2007)

    S.Res. 39 (109th): Lynching Victims Senate Apology resolution (2005)

    "Going back to the time before we were even a nation, European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were wrong in that." -- President Bill Clinton (1998)

    * * *

    These are only a few recent, official, federal apologies. There were also many, many other apologies from the states, various politicians, and celebrities (all of whom are part of the national entity). And let's not overlook that the USA has also instituted numerous pieces of apologetic legislation, including race-based scholarships, affirmative action in the workforce, anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws, and more.

    Sanders himself was one of the co-sponsors one of those official apologies, and still he says that "we" need to apologize. To continue to demand an apology is to reject the apologies that have already been issued (even his own). What does the final, acceptable apology look like? Maybe its time for the apologies to finally be accepted.

    If I was a cynic, I would conclude that it really is about reparations and putting some money in the pocket of community organizers...
     
    Top Bottom