Romney...oh Romney

[printcraft]

It's a sad day on INGO when I see all these Hillary supporters.

If we can suppress turnout enough she is sure to win.

 

[edporch]

It's a sad day on INGO when I see all these Hillary supporters.

Yes, a vote for Trump will in the end be a vote for Hillary I hate to say.

 

[spec4]

Yes, a vote for Trump will in the end be a vote for Hillary I hate to say.

Don;t understand that. Whereas Hillary has virtually no qualifications for the job, and could (should) have to face the music with the FBI, Trump has overall done well in his career and will surely be different from the same crap we see coming from Washington. Hillary, in her unlimited arrogance, wants to take Obama's programs to the next level.

It is my sincere hope she loses Indiana. If she wins, we can thank some on this forum.

 

[jamil]

Don;t understand that. Whereas Hillary has virtually no qualifications for the job, and could (should) have to face the music with the FBI, Trump has overall done well in his career and will surely be different from the same crap we see coming from Washington. Hillary, in her unlimited arrogance, wants to take Obama's programs to the next level.

It is my sincere hope she loses Indiana. If she wins, we can thank some on this forum.

So INGO has that much pull? It's the "INGO for Hillary" bumpersticker on Fenway's Bugatti. I bet that's it.

 

[jd4320t]

Yes, a vote for Trump will in the end be a vote for Hillary I hate to say.

I disagree.

That attitude is giving up in my opinion. I haven't given up. I support anything besides Hillary or Bernie. That's the hand we've been dealt.

 

[edporch]

Originally Posted by edporch Yes, a vote for Trump will in the end be a vote for Hillary I hate to say.

Don;t understand that. Whereas Hillary has virtually no qualifications for the job, and could (should) have to face the music with the FBI, Trump has overall done well in his career and will surely be different from the same crap we see coming from Washington. Hillary, in her unlimited arrogance, wants to take Obama's programs to the next level.

It is my sincere hope she loses Indiana. If she wins, we can thank some on this forum.

Let me explain.

To start with, I question whether Trump is even electable in a General Election.
Which knowing this, voting for Trump instead of a better candidate that can win, who ALSO believes in the US Constitution, IS a vote for Hillary.

Trump has a life long track record as a northeastern liberal up until recently at almost 70 years old, when he NOW claims to suddenly be conservative.
If Trump had a several year track record as a conservative, it would be believable.
Without it, it's NOT believable to elect somebody to the highest office in the Free World.

For example, Trump supported more gun control including the so-called "assault weapon" ban up until he decided to run for President.
Now he claims suddenly he's a strong 2nd amendment supporter.

Add this in with the fact that Trump says "everything is negotiable", and has longtime close ties to the like of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer.
Trump's given thousands of dollars to them and says he can "make deals" with them.

Trump even gave money to Hillary to run for President on 4 different occasions in 2008.
What will he do when Hillary points this out in the General Election?

ANYBODY who knows the political landscape knows you CAN'T make "deals" with the hard left that don't screw US.
The hard left doesn't compromise.

The bottom line is, I don't trust Trump.

He's a con-man, has screwed people out of $billions through the years, and has more BS than any politician from EITHER party I've seen since I began following politics in the mid 1970's.

I will NEVER vote for Trump.

 

[spec4]

Well, I hear where you're coming from, but IMO Bill Clinton was the biggest political BS artist I've ever come across. Remember when everything was "for the children"? I can't stand that clown.
Walker was my first pick as he had done so well against the Liberals in Wisconsin and seemed to be a no nonsense guy. After he dropped out, I just wanted someone who could beat Clinton. Today I think Cruz may be best for us. If Trump is the nominee, I take it you will stay home.

A friend in Florida said he voted for Rubio today. He thinks he would be the best bet to beat Clinton.

 

[Tombs]

Originally Posted by edporch Yes, a vote for Trump will in the end be a vote for Hillary I hate to say.




Let me explain.

To start with, I question whether Trump is even electable in a General Election.
Which knowing this, voting for Trump instead of a better candidate that can win, who ALSO believes in the US Constitution, IS a vote for Hillary.

Trump has a life long track record as a northeastern liberal up until recently at almost 70 years old, when he NOW claims to suddenly be conservative.
If Trump had a several year track record as a conservative, it would be believable.
Without it, it's NOT believable to elect somebody to the highest office in the Free World.

For example, Trump supported more gun control including the so-called "assault weapon" ban up until he decided to run for President.
Now he claims suddenly he's a strong 2nd amendment supporter.

Add this in with the fact that Trump says "everything is negotiable", and has longtime close ties to the like of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer.
Trump's given thousands of dollars to them and says he can "make deals" with them.

Trump even gave money to Hillary to run for President on 4 different occasions in 2008.
What will he do when Hillary points this out in the General Election?

ANYBODY who knows the political landscape knows you CAN'T make "deals" with the hard left that don't screw US.
The hard left doesn't compromise.

The bottom line is, I don't trust Trump.

He's a con-man, has screwed people out of $billions through the years, and has more BS than any politician from EITHER party I've seen since I began following politics in the mid 1970's.

I will NEVER vote for Trump.

Willful ignorance to support your personal bias isn't something to wave around proudly.

The majority of his donations went to conservatives.

[Source]

It's nice to know you're one of the people who will gladly support taking my guns away simply to spite a republican you dislike.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Don;t understand that. Whereas Hillary has virtually no qualifications for the job, and could (should) have to face the music with the FBI, Trump has overall done well in his career and will surely be different from the same crap we see coming from Washington. Hillary, in her unlimited arrogance, wants to take Obama's programs to the next level.

It is my sincere hope she loses Indiana. If she wins, we can thank some on this forum.

No qualifications for the job? Are we basing this on her actual experience in govt, or simply saying this because you dislike her? If it's the former, I'd like you to clarify.

 

[Tombs]

No qualifications for the job? Are we basing this on her actual experience in govt, or simply saying this because you dislike her? If it's the former, I'd like you to clarify.

If she's secretary of state and doesn't know what constitutes classified information, I would be willing to go out on a limb and say she does not have any qualifications for political office.

On the flip side, if she does know, then she is guilty of espionage and multiple felony offenses which disqualify her from office.

 

[Kutnupe14]

If she's secretary of state and doesn't know what constitutes classified information, I would be willing to go out on a limb and say she does not have any qualifications for political office.

On the flip side, if she does know, then she is guilty of espionage and multiple felony offenses which disqualify her from office.

That's a fair assessment. I won't argue her incompetence, but she does have noteworthy qualifications.

 

[Spear Dane]

I'm easy to please. I simply want anyone who isn't a liberal.

 

[BugI02]

He's right, Kut. Being an unindicted felon Trumps (he he) any other experience. And does anybody think her experience as First Lady or as a senator from NY made her the best choice for SoS, or even in the top ten? Or was it political payback

 

[17 squirrel]

Originally Posted by edporch

He's a con-man, has screwed people out of $billions through the years,

I will NEVER vote for Trump.

Can you please explain to me how Donald has screwed folks of of $Billions of dollars please ????

 

[IndyDave1776]

That's a fair assessment. I won't argue her incompetence, but she does have noteworthy qualifications.

I have to disagree with this statement. Noteworthy qualifications come from HAVING DONE A JOB CORRECTLY, not merely having a few extra lines on your resume filled with what amount to epic failures.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I have to disagree with this statement. Noteworthy qualifications come from HAVING DONE A JOB CORRECTLY, not merely having a few extra lines on your resume filled with what amount to epic failures.

Personally, I doubt she has had any more failures than others in similar positions. She's just disliked more.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Personally, I doubt she has had any more failures than others in similar positions. She's just disliked more.

OK, so who else has mishandled classified information on the scale she has, or has a Benghazi on their watch?

 

[BugI02]

Personally, I doubt she has had any more failures than others in similar positions. She's just disliked more.

Well, you have to go back to 1979 to find another US Ambassador killed (Adolph Dubs)

 

[Tombs]

Personally, I doubt she has had any more failures than others in similar positions. She's just disliked more.

[video=youtube;UtH7iv4ip1U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U[/video]

I don't know, that's some big shoes to fill. I don't recall Bush laughing and making jokes about killing Saddam.

 

[AA&E]

Or, more like it takes one to know one.

And yet it was of no concern when he was the one heralding his success as qualification for the highest office in the land. Interesting stance.