Romney...oh Romney

[Kutnupe14]

OK, so who else has mishandled classified information on the scale she has, or has a Benghazi on their watch?

Ronald Reagan?


Kut (thinks that was too easy, lol)

 

[jamil]

Ronald Reagan?


Kut (thinks that was too easy, lol)

I think you're overestimating one and underestimating the other.

 

[Mr Evilwrench]

Well, try to dissect Trump all you want based on whatever criteria you use to select a candidate you're least dissatisfied with, and by all means, tell people what those criteria are. Just realize, it won't do any good. Our choices have narrowed down to no, hell no, WTF and Cruz. Trump has at least picked the scabs off some stuff that needed the scabs picked off, and I'm glad of that. He says what he says, you have to determine whether you believe it for yourself. He brings uncertainty, but at the worst I don't think guns are going to be at the top of his list. No and hell no are both campaigning on that, as well as gorebull warmening. McRomney and all those empty suits' idea of an electable candidate is someone nobody could possibly work up enough enthusiasm to vote for.

As long as there's a Cruz button I'm pushing that. If it's hell no or Trump, I'll push Trump, and I won't even have to hold my nose for him.