Report: No "Global Warming" for 325 Months...

[actaeon277]

NY Attorney General Tries to Criminalize Scientific Dissent on Climate Change

Well, this is what happens when we don't educate people on what a Constitutional Republic is, or why it's so important.
People can only get away with this, because others allow it.

 

[Sling10mm]

Hillary Clinton Calls For Exxon Mobil Probe After Gas Giant Pulls Funding For Clinton?s Nonprofit

Sue Exxon for global warming.

"There's a lot of evidence they misled"….. insert something here about the pot calling the kettle black.

 

[JollyMon]

Greenhouse gases hit new milestone, fueling worries about climate change - The Orange County Register

 

[JeremiahJohnson]

Greenhouse gases hit new milestone, fueling worries about climate change - The Orange County Register

"The report is likely to add to concerns about global warming in a year that climate experts say is almost certain to surpass 2014 as the hottest year in recorded history"

Says who? Where? First I've heard it. To the title of this thread...uh...who says 2014 was the hottest year in recorded history?

 

[LockStocksAndBarrel]

We all might as well just lay down and die.

 

[eldirector]

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201413

The year 2014 was the warmest year across global land and ocean surfaces since records began in 1880.

I have noticed that almost ALL of the "climate change" supporters use charts that start in about 1800, at the earliest. Wonder why?

 

[chipbennett]

"The report is likely to add to concerns about global warming in a year that climate experts say is almost certain to surpass 2014 as the hottest year in recorded history"

Says who? Where? First I've heard it. To the title of this thread...uh...who says 2014 was the hottest year in recorded history?

NOAA makes that ludicrous claim.

The 1930s are still laughing at them.

 

[Jludo]

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201413

I have noticed that almost ALL of the "climate change" supporters use charts that start in about 1800, at the earliest. Wonder why?

They heard Ken Hamm say you can't make any claims about "historical science"

 

[Jludo]

"The report is likely to add to concerns about global warming in a year that climate experts say is almost certain to surpass 2014 as the hottest year in recorded history"

Says who? Where? First I've heard it. To the title of this thread...uh...who says 2014 was the hottest year in recorded history?

NASA, NOAA, Japanese meteorological agency, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research...ya know, hacks

 

[rhino]

I did a bad, bad thing.

In an online class that shall not be named at an institution that shall not be named, I received a message from a student asking if they can change the topic of their essay to "global warming."

I said it was okay, but I suggest 1) that they narrow the topic a bit, and 2) consider reviewing some sources that did not automatically assume facts that were not in evidence. I suggested that there were a number of assertions and assumptions in the text book and in the course assignments that are not supported by any factual, repeatable evidence and that I would find it refreshing if someone approached the essay as a scientific inquiry with suitable scientific skepticism.

The can has been opened. I have not yet assessed the extent and severity of the worm coverage.

 

[JeremiahJohnson]

NASA, NOAA, Japanese meteorological agency, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research...ya know, hacks

The same hacks that say we're in a 14-17 year "pause"? How can it be both?

 

[jamil]

Aren't you forgetting "pause-gate"?

 

[eldirector]

Aren't you forgetting "pause-gate"?

I little grease, and it swings freely again.

 

[jamil]

I little grease, and it swings freely again.

Compressed within those words is a novella of truth.

 

[JeremiahJohnson]

Compressed within those words is a novella of truth.

 

[chipbennett]

NASA, NOAA, Japanese meteorological agency, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research...ya know, hacks

Having seen what they do with the raw data: yes, they are hacks.

 

[printcraft]

NASA, NOAA, Japanese meteorological agency, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research...ya know, hacks

So because a group of people are in an "organization" they are to be trusted to be impartial?
Just stick an all encompassing label and they are above reproach?
People make up the organization, people want to fit in to the pushed agenda and keep their jobs.

 

[IndyDave1776]

NASA, NOAA, Japanese meteorological agency, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research...ya know, hacks

Yes, we know, the State Science Institute shall not be questioned.

 

[Jludo]

So because a group of people are in an "organization" they are to be trusted to be impartial?
Just stick an all encompassing label and they are above reproach?
People make up the organization, people want to fit in to the pushed agenda and keep their jobs.

I know that's what I'm saying, it's a green energy plot to destroy our economy. Clearly most all climate experts and organizations are in on it. I'm just glad we have the experts here to parse the raw data and tell us what it really means.

 

[printcraft]

I know that's what I'm saying, it's a green energy plot to destroy our economy. Clearly most all climate experts and organizations are in on it. I'm just glad we have the experts here to parse the raw data and tell us what it really means.

Do you have that same faith in all organizations?

How about the Whitehouse? Congress? The NSA? The Police? Big Banks? Israel?