Re-Elect the President?

[Ted]

I swear...it is like you took what Bush said about the fight against terrorism and applied it to voting...

I'm taking what war actually is.......sometimes having to make a deal with the Devil, to avoid being subjected to the most obvious and immediate tyranny.

But what exactly of my previous statement of third party candidates isn't correct?

 

[Classic Liberal]

I'm taking what war actually is.......sometimes having to make a deal with the Devil, to avoid being subjected to the most obvious and immediate tyranny.

But what exactly of my previous statement isn't correct?

And electing Romney would be a little less obvious and immediate tyranny, but would still be tyranny.

 

[threefiftyfour]

I have a hole in my back yard that needs filled, you can put your head there while you vote!

 

[LEaSH]

-1.0/-0.5/0/+0.5/+1.0

It's not complex.

 

[hornadylnl]

-1.0/-0.5/0/+0.5/+1.0

It's not complex.

So I get to vote for more than one candidate on my ballot? I can shade in a full circle for a whole vote and shade in a half circle for a half vote?

 

[adam]

I voted no because I'm not directly voting for Obama, but if voting for a 3rd party is a vote for Obama (as some claim) then I'll change it to yes. I have no desire to encourage the GOP to continue to run up terrible candidates while squashing legitimate inter-party opposition.

I keep telling myself that the GOP will figure it out, in the mean time they can pound sand.

 

[ATOMonkey]

So I get to vote for more than one candidate on my ballot? I can shade in a full circle for a whole vote and shade in a half circle for a half vote?

I think we should get one vote for every $1,000 we pay in personal income tax.

 

[Ash]

I think we should get one vote for every $1,000 we pay in personal income tax.

Very interesting.

I just thought of this for a minute. This would be a very neat and entertaining experiment to witness here in the US.




Oh, and I selected 'No' as my choice.
And, others can call us third party voters whatever they want. We have thick skin.

 

[thumperdogg]

Ron Paul...

I wish!!!!!!

 

[Ted]

And electing Romney would be a little less obvious and immediate tyranny, but would still be tyranny.

You have no disagreement from me there. Though do you really want another 4 years of Obama?

 

[Classic Liberal]

You have no disagreement from me there. Though do you really want another 4 years of Obama?

I would like another 4 years of neither.

 

[Wreaver]

it's a moot point. Barry has started to seperate from Romney. should start digging in for the long haul.

 

[Classic Liberal]

Does it really matter whether it's Obama or Romney? After the election, it will be in the hands of the puppet masters anyhow...

 

[Blackhawk2001]

Does it really matter whether it's Obama or Romney? After the election, it will be in the hands of the puppet masters anyhow...

Better get your ticket to Australia - or are you going to stick around and do something about it.

 

[Ted]

Does it really matter whether it's Obama or Romney? After the election, it will be in the hands of the puppet masters anyhow...

So there is no real excuse to not vote for Romney, is there?

 

[hookedonjeep]

Had to go with "NO" because there was not a BACON option.....

 

[Classic Liberal]

Better get your ticket to Australia - or are you going to stick around and do something about it.

Yep, I'll stick around and continue to promote the principles that founded this great nation. I'll advocate what I can where I can.

 

[Blackhawk2001]

Considering the fiasco in Libya and Egypt, may I please vote "NO" again?

 

[DRob]

I don't know

I'm not sure how to vote since I'm voting neither Obama or Romney. Is my third party vote a vote for Obama?

I don't know whether Romney or Obama will benefit the most from 3rd party voters but I'm sure my vote for Romney will not benefit Obama. 'Nuff said!

 

[churchmouse]

Considering the fiasco in Libya and Egypt, may I please vote "NO" again?

I would like another stab at "No"