Mueller report delivered

[K_W]

Nah. No purple needed. As silly as this sounds I would not be surprised.

Count on it... they already have them lined up.

 

[churchmouse]

Count on it... they already have them lined up.

They must have been at the sex party's with Kavenaughs accusers.

 

[K_W]

They must have been at the sex party's with Kavenaughs accusers.

That they were...

 

[bwframe]

[video=youtube;rI5HivVS3V8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI5HivVS3V8[/video]

 

[Phase2]

So when do Google, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms start banning Trump-Russia conspiracy theorists for spreading fake news?

 

[DoggyDaddy]

So when do Google, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms start banning Trump-Russia conspiracy theorists for spreading fake news?

[video=youtube;nNNRGa3pKyw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNNRGa3pKyw[/video]

 

[KG1]

So, what's the consensus now? Is Mueller still a bad guy, or did he and he (as previously said) angry Democrat investigators conduct an honorable investigation?

My post from upthread on my thoughts of Mueller and his team.

They play dirty for sure. I'm not totally convinced that Mueller and his team were exactly dealing on the up and up behind the scenes. One example is what they tried to do to Jerome Corsi over the wikileaks DNC email dump and the disemination of the information. Mueller's team wanted to pin something on Trump over that.

He claims they tried to get him to take a plea deal for some bogus procedural crime they could charge him with in exchange for making false statements to buttress their case against Trump but Corsi refused to take any such deal. Said he would rather go to jail than testfiy to what they wanted him to say (basically lie). If I remember correctly Corsi made a big stink at the time and threatned to take legal action against Mueller's team and would'nt you know it the Mueller investigation ended without Corsi being charged.

 

[jamil]

Every liberal I've talked to is latching onto the "does not exonerate" part.

Of course it doesn't exonerate him, that wasn't the point, the point was to indict him. You cannot prove a negative anyway.

You can too prove a negative. You just can’t prove it in an infinite or unknowable domain of facts. The case of collusion doesn’t really fit that. It’s difficulty makes it impractical, so it’s impractical to prove this negative. But not impossible. In this case, though not practical to overturn every stone, enough stones we’re overturned to reasonably assure an objective person that it’s extremely unlikely that there was collusion. Of course to a biased person... Collusion!

The obstruction part is simpler. It seemed that Bar was saying that if there’s no evidence of a crime, it’s kinda hard to prove there was any willful obstruction. Most of the cries of obstruction revolve around the firing of Comey. But Trump gave us a very easy to believe, very Trumpian reason for firing Comey. It was because Comey wouldn’t say the words he wanted him to say, publicly. Kinda petty, as I said, very Trumpian, but within his power to do as president.

 

[jamil]

So the Dems are claiming now that Trump is guilty of trying to cover up that there was no collusion?

Yes. That’s exactly what they’re saying.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Watching Savannah Guthrie right now. I think she's going to grind her teeth down to nubs if she's not careful...

 

[Expat]

Watching Savannah Guthrie right now. I think she's going to grind her teeth down to nubs if she's not careful...

LOL, you can almost feel her pain right through the screen. I wonder if she was stamping her foot the entire interview with Sarah. Then in the little panel they had, that other chick... whew, she was really upset as well.

 

[jamil]

It’s almost like there should be a word for enjoyment derived from other people’s misery.

 

[Expat]

Apparently if you say "he wasn't exonerated" three times in an interview, you gain magical powers.

 

[churchmouse]

LOL, you can almost feel her pain right through the screen. I wonder if she was stamping her foot the entire interview with Sarah. Then in the little panel they had, that other chick... whew, she was really upset as well.

It is just so obvious that when the left wants it to be then it is just going to be that way. Amazing. Life has some downsides. Grow a set and deal with it.

Oh, and while you are acquiring adult status be as critical of your people.

 

[jamil]

Apparently if you say "he wasn't exonerated" three times in an interview, you gain magical powers.

George Snufflupogus said something to the effect, he wasn’t exonerated on obstruction but Bar stepped in to do that.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

LOL, you can almost feel her pain right through the screen. I wonder if she was stamping her foot the entire interview with Sarah. Then in the little panel they had, that other chick... whew, she was really upset as well.

I think this meltdown will be second only to the 2016 election. Waiting for people to dust off their ***** hats and start the protests.

 

[KG1]

Apparently if you say "he wasn't exonerated" three times in an interview, you gain magical powers.

They’ll cling to anything to get the bad orange man.

 

[KG1]

George Snufflupogus said something to the effect, he wasn’t exonerated on obstruction but Bar stepped in to do that.

Barr’s exoneration is invalid because he’s impartial according to the Democrats and the talking heads. He should’ve recused himself because Trump picked him for AG.

 

[jamil]

Barr’s exoneration is invalid because he’s impartial according to the Democrats and the talking heads. He should’ve recused himself because Trump picked him for AG.

I kinda tend to agree with Bar. It’s incredible to say it’s obstruction when you can’t even say a crime was committed. Now if Mueller did find evidence of collusion and recommended impeachment, there would likely have been a recommendation for obstruction charges too.

 

[KG1]

I kinda tend to agree with Bar. It’s incredible to say it’s obstruction when you can’t even say a crime was committed. Now if Mueller did find evidence of collusion and recommended impeachment, there would likely have been a recommendation for obstruction charges too.

I think it was in the report that Mueller’s investigation wasn’t impeded in any way. The AG has an obligation to report any such issue to Congress if it was. There really is nothing to hang an obstruction charge on.