Mosul has fallen

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Expat - maybe you've hit upon something. Maybe, in a very zen way, it all balances out for the left.

    Femalegenitalmutilation = bad
    Nomorechristians = good

    That could explain the ambivalence.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,731
    113
    Uranus
    Expat - maybe you've hit upon something. Maybe, in a very zen way, it all balances out for the left.

    Femalegenitalmutilation = bad
    Nomorechristians = good

    That could explain the ambivalence.

    Sort of like some of the same people that are for gay marriage say that marriage between man and woman is akin to legalized rape.
    It depends on how big of a hypocrite you are when defending those positions. The bigger the hypocrite, the less it matters.
     

    Phil502

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    3,035
    63
    NW Indiana
    Well, we may be talking about different things. (Are you thinking of manipulation?) ;)

    In my experience, the left vociferously condemns foreign cultures that engage in female genital mutilation. Of course, I find the practice itself abhorrent, but I also recognize that as a reflection of the cultural norms within which I was raised. Different cultures value things differently.

    Condemns it or excuses it as cultural/religious idiosyncrasy?
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Condemns it or excuses it as cultural/religious idiosyncrasy?

    Well, there could easily be a split on the left that I'm not familiar with - I admit that I don't travel too much in those circles. :D

    But, when it has come up in my conversations with people from that side of the aisle, it seems to be one of the few big foreign policy interventionist things they get up in arms about. The FGM gets them more outraged than summary executions or ethnic cleansing (mostly of Christians).

    I could be wrong, though.
     

    Phil502

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    3,035
    63
    NW Indiana
    Well, there could easily be a split on the left that I'm not familiar with - I admit that I don't travel too much in those circles. :D

    But, when it has come up in my conversations with people from that side of the aisle, it seems to be one of the few big foreign policy interventionist things they get up in arms about. The FGM gets them more outraged than summary executions or ethnic cleansing (mostly of Christians).

    I could be wrong, though.

    I'm sure they are more worked up about a few gnats getting killed by rifle fire than the execution of a few non- believers.
     

    Justus

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jun 21, 2008
    642
    18
    not in Indy
    After being pushed back and overrun the peshmerga of the Kurdish are preparing a counteroffensive. The IS just keeps right on going into Iraq and taking over everything they try to get. Best of luck to the Kurds. Looks like they're going to need it.

    https://news.vice.com/article/kurdish-forces-prepare-to-counterattack-the-islamic-state

    Yep, ISIS (or ISIL) is definitely a force to be reckoned with. I read recently that they are setting their sights on Saudi Arabia
     

    1911ly

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 11, 2011
    13,420
    83
    South Bend
    Yep, ISIS (or ISIL) is definitely a force to be reckoned with. I read recently that they are setting their sights on Saudi Arabia

    Normally I'd say the Saudi's have nothing to worry about. But not with this administration. I doubt Obama will do anything to stop them. The work that was done in Iraq has been flushed down the toilet. I don't want to see another war but if ISIS is not stopped they will just keep expanding. At some point we will face them again. But probably after they have Saudi and Iraqi oil money to back them. They now control of a dam in Iraq. They can flood the area around it now. They have even more control then they had. they are getting stronger. They aren't going to stop until they (Isis) are defeated. Peace is not in there charter. Fight them or might as well get comfortable with buying the women in your family a burqa's.
     

    CathyInBlue

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    It's not very charitable, but I say let IS take over as much of the Arab/Muslim world as they can. It'll weaken, not strengthen them. Them being a combination of the Arab/Muslim world, global Islamofacist jihad, and IS itself. We tried our best to strengthen Afghanistan and Iraq. We failed. There is no shame in that. If giving a nation-state power over itself cannot succeed in creating a powerful nation-state that can stand on its own, then maybe the answer is in the opposite. Kind of like the attitude of Gabriel in the movie Constantine. Give these backward people a taste of Hell on Earth, inflicted not by us, but by their own kind. See if they learn to rise up and stand on their own feet that way.

    I'll be waiting with bated breath when IS starts marching into Paki and Saudi territory. So, the Arab world is on fire after we spent so much time dousing it in fire-retardant foam. Oh well. This is gonna be fun.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Can't say I completely disagree with that attitude.

    For me, the problem is building strong enough fences. Like Turkey - it is a predominantly Muslim nation, but not (generally) of the islamofascist kind. So, it makes sense to support Turkey's efforts to both have a strong defense and a buffer (Kurdistan).

    Similar thing goes for Saudi Arabia, except for the petrodollars at stake there. Take oil out of it, and I wouldn't shed any tears over the fall of the House of Saud. But, we can't really take the oil out of the equation, so then it gets complicated.

    Then there's Israel. A petro-rich, fundamentalist IS is going to eye the destruction of Israel as a high priority. That'll really test USian commitments.

    Life is complicated. :/
     

    CathyInBlue

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    I agree that we should be supporting legitimate moderate nation-states that happen to be Muslim, like Turkey, and when it's not eating itself, Egypt. The issue with supporting Kurdistan is we already burned them once. If I was a Kurd, I wouldn't trust the US any further than I could shot-put a Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier.

    A) What kind of support do the Kurds need?
    B) What kind of support can we give them now?
    C) What kind of support would they accept from the US?
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Totally agree about the Kurdish-US relationship. Good for them for resisting the urge (apparently) to turn to Russia or China for help. Pretty much agree with your approach to Kurdistan.

    Saudi, Syria, even Iran will be the problems. Although, if it could be contained an IS/Iraq v. Iran fight could be interesting.
     
    Top Bottom