^This^ would've been the rational and proper way to have handled it.Exactly right. Had the officer stopped him and ask to see his LTCH that would have been just fine. However, they didn't do that. They, apparently, didn't even care if he was carrying legally when this all started.
I'm sure that Mr. Edinger would'nt have had a problem with this as an responsible legal firearm carrier that is aware of his rights, which by all indications are pointing to that he is.
Once an LTCH would've been produced and there was no indication that he was trying to intimidate other voters or sway their votes or keep them from voting by carrying then there was no reason for things to go down hill the way they did.
He should've then been allowed to carry on with what he came there to do and that is exercise his right to vote and be on his way.