List your shooters here.

[Woobie]

What's rule 19?

I said that when I thought we were making up rules. I hadn't planned on further scrutiny.

Hmm... Conspiracy, lack of real scrutiny... this is starting to remind of the 9/11 thread.

 

[SEIndSAM]

Dang, I liked Woobie....But if he violated rule 6, I thought that was punishable by castration..........

 

[Woobie]

Dang, I liked Woobie....But if he violated rule 6, I thought that was punishable by castration..........

Hah, jokes on you! I'm married

 

[Vigilant]

This is how we (staff) see this. The threads and conversations that would surround this would be troublesome.
Every one has an opinion. Unless they get to see everything we do they are limited in forming an opinion by info available.

If something were to become controversial how it is handled would depend on the situation.

The green curtain is up for a reason.

Besides, this is INGO, where we refuse to cloud a good argument with facts!

 

[churchmouse]

Hah, jokes on you! I'm married

So she has your package.....

 

[Woobie]

Besides, this is INGO, where we refuse to cloud a good argument with facts!

I already mentioned the 9/11 thread. Who's plagiarizing now?

 

[Woobie]

So she has your package.....

You'll never find them!

 

[littletommy]

Just so I'm up to speed with the goings on here, Woobie got banned for breaking a rule GPIA made up and churchmouse castrated him? That seems a little harsh!

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Just so I'm up to speed with the goings on here, Woobie got banned for breaking a rule GPIA made up and churchmouse castrated him? That seems a little harsh!

INGO is serious business.

 

[SEIndSAM]

INGO is serious bidness.

FIFY

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

FIFY

Mo' better.

 

[Vigilant]

I already mentioned the 9/11 thread. Who's plagiarizing now?

And I refuse to be swayed by facts! (About 9/11 or anything I want to argue about) So, if you insist on facts clouding this argument, I must bid you good day sir!

 

[jamil]

Just so I'm up to speed with the goings on here, Woobie got banned for breaking a rule GPIA made up and churchmouse castrated him? That seems a little harsh!

Pretty much. But I'm still not sure how rule 19, which bans conspiracies, fits in with this.

 

[printcraft]

So does this mean we can reopen the "race to 50" thread? Closing it gave me a sad.

 

[Woobie]

And I refuse to be swayed by facts! (About 9/11 or anything I want to argue about) So, if you insist on facts clouding this argument, I must bid you good day sir!

I say good day!

 

[Woobie]

Pretty much. But I'm still not sure how rule 19, which bans conspiracies, fits in with this.

It's a conspiracy. You wouldn't understand.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Pretty much. But I'm still not sure how rule 19, which bans conspiracies, fits in with this.

Looking at the "Rules of the Internet"... number 19 is "The more you hate it, the stronger it gets."

Oddly fitting.

 

[Rookie]

How hard would it be to change shooter to "temp shooter" or "permashooter"?

 

[SEIndSAM]

So does this mean we can reopen the "race to 50" thread? Closing it gave me a sad.

Reopening that thread would violate Rule 25.......And we don't even want to go there...

 

[PaulF]

How hard would it be to change shooter to "temp shooter" or "permashooter"?

"Shooter" is linked with a default vBulletin User Group called "Banned Users". The software, in its current configuration, does not separate "temp-banned" users from "perma-banned" users. Instead, it allows staff members to set a time frame during which a user is placed in the "Banned Users" group...it can be for a couple of days or weeks, or forever.

I think (and this is mostly a guess, so take it with a grain of salt) that other "User Groups" could be defined and populated (something like "Temp-Shooter"/"Perma-Shooter"), and then Custom User Titles could (potentially) be assigned to those groups. The hitch, I think, would be linking the new user categories within the vBulletin software to automatically place the newly-banned user into the correct user category (Temp/Perma) to keep it user-friendly for the staff.

I suspect there would be significant coding required to accomplish this, and that would be an effort only the site owners could authorize.