Leaked/breaking:Roe v. Wade expected to be overturned

[printcraft]

 

[Creedmoor]

Nah, he changed the word children to babys, which should be babies

One in four.

 

[Creedmoor]

That's a hurdle, that if it actually materializes, is easily dealt with by reductions in those regulations that drive the costs up. Not by continuing to kill babies.

My wife and I would love to adOpt and make that problem ours however, that's beside the point. The problem is not yours either and even if it were, continuing the killing unborn babies would be a pathetically **** poor way to solve it.

There were approximately 930,000 abortions in 2020, do you really believe out of those that could have gone to term, they would all or most be adopted?
What would become of those that were not adopted?

 

[ancjr]

What would become of those that were not adopted?

Something better than being dismembered and sold for experiments I'm sure.

 

[Cameramonkey]

There were approximately 930,000 abortions in 2020, do you really believe out of those that could have gone to term, they would all or most be adopted?
What would become of those that were not adopted?

Soylent Green? Baby Oil?

 

[Creedmoor]

Something better than being aborted.

So no answer with what to do with a gazillion unwanted babies, that grow to children over the next few years in half of the States here?
History tends to repeat itself. Hummmm, visions of my youth I see.

 

[Cameramonkey]

There were approximately 930,000 abortions in 2020, do you really believe out of those that could have gone to term, they would all or most be adopted?
What would become of those that were not adopted?

So no answer with what to do with a gazillion unwanted babies, that grow to children over the next few years in half of the States here?
History tends to repeat itself. Hummmm, visions of my youth I see.

Dude! You expect an answer in 30 minutes? Pump the brakes.

 

[Creedmoor]

Soylent Green? Baby Oil?

You think its going to be humorous?

Your a Christian Conservative Pro Lifer right?
How many has your house adopted again?

 

[Creedmoor]

Dude! You expect an answer in 30 minutes? Pump the brakes.

He answered my post, and I responded.
I also responded to your silly purple post.

 

[Cameramonkey]

You think its going to be humorous?

Your a Christian Conservative Pro Lifer right?
How many has your house adopted again?

Once again, pump the brakes. And chill. Walk away. Such energetic rage often leads to at LEAST a time out, if not a shooter status.

And no. Libertarian who has a nuanced belief where some abortion is legit and others not.

 

[ancjr]

So no answer with what to do with a gazillion unwanted babies, that grow to children over the next few years in half of the States here?
History tends to repeat itself. Hummmm, visions of my youth I see.

You can, at your leisure, read the earlier post I made on the subject and accept that as my final answer.

 

[BigRed]

So no answer with what to do with a gazillion unwanted babies, that grow to children over the next few years in half of the States here?
History tends to repeat itself. Hummmm, visions of my youth I see.

What would you like to be done?

 

[actaeon277]

Maybe the Left should be mad at themselves.
They had all this time to make it law.

Again.
All the time the Left had, to make a LAW.
Did they?

 

[ljk]

What would you like to be done?

That's the question for the pro-lifers.

You asked for these babies, now they are yours.

 

[ancjr]

None of these accusations stick. None of us have jurisdiction to provide a remedy.

 

[Cameramonkey]

That's the question for the pro-lifers.

You asked for these babies, now they are yours.

Are we not allowed to ask them to not be a ho? At least cut down on the supply chain a bit? I mean, there are plenty of ways to NOT make babies. Some are even 100% effective.

At least let us deal with ONLY the supply of rape and incest babies only, pretty please?
(Yes, I'm being just as over the top as you)

 

[BigRed]

That's the question for the pro-lifers.

You asked for these babies, now they are yours.

No. My question was what would you like to be done.

What would you like to be done?

 

[BugI02]

That's the question for the pro-lifers.

You asked for these babies, now they are yours.

Nobody 'asked' for those babies. We would be ecstatic if people spent the extra 10 seconds necessary to make sure that their casual sex doesn't result in a pregnancy

To try to make others responsible for the bad choices of the irresponsible is textbook moral hazard. The time to be worried about who will take care of your baby if you can't kill it is before you create that life

What you suggest is analogous to requiring law abiding gun owners to be responsible for gang members killing each other because we seek as few restrictions on gunownershipr as possible. It is nonsensical

 

[jamil]

Not very if there is only accusation of looking down the nose at reality.

Another reality is plastic baptists, outwardly anti-abortion, but secretly arranging abortions for their daughters to save their family repute. Obviously they aren't confident in their belief about abortion.

Btw, Baptists shouldn't get too hung up about the term plastic baptist. I've used it for years to mean any religious person regardless of religion who pretends to be pious.

 

[Creedmoor]

Once again, pump the brakes. And chill. Walk away. Such energetic rage often leads to at LEAST a time out, if not a shooter status.

And no. Libertarian who has a nuanced belief where some abortion is legit and others not.

Where is this rage from me you speak of?
This has been a conversation here, no one is raging or ranting.