Kamala Harris for president 2024

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,700
    113
    Uranus
    If six or more of the statements are false, then the challenger — in this case, Trump — is predicted to win.

    Here are the keys, and Lichtman’s determinations for each:

    1. Party Mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previous midterm elections. FALSE
    2. Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination. TRUE
    3. Incumbency: The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president. FALSE
    4. Third party: There is no significant third-party or independent campaign. TRUE
    5. Short-term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign. TRUE. FALSE we're just not calling it that.
    6. Long-term economy: Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms. TRUE
    7. Policy change: The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy. TRUE
    8. Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term. TRUE FALSE crime and illegal border crossing is out of control.
    9. Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal. TRUE. FALSE JFC
    10. Incumbent charisma: The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. FALSE
    11. Challenger charisma: The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero. TRUE
    12. Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs. FALSE foreign policy is a nightmare.
    13. Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs. FALSE
    Good luck chuck.
     

    DadSmith

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 21, 2018
    25,737
    113
    Ripley County

    John Kirby, the White House's national security communications adviser, said Putin "shouldn't be favoring anybody one way or another."

    "The only people who should get to determine who the next president of the United States is, is the American people," he told reporters, according to a White House statement. Kirby added that the US would "greatly appreciate" it if Putin would "A. stop talking about our election, and B. stop interfering in it."

    Putin's endorsement of Harris doesn't do the Democrat party any favors. In fact it should make people wake up.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,700
    113
    Uranus

    John Kirby, the White House's national security communications adviser, said Putin "shouldn't be favoring anybody one way or another."

    "The only people who should get to determine who the next president of the United States is, is the American people," he told reporters, according to a White House statement. Kirby added that the US would "greatly appreciate" it if Putin would "A. stop talking about our election, and B. stop interfering in it."

    Putin's endorsement of Harris doesn't do the Democrat party any favors. In fact it should make people wake up.

    Clearly harris is a russian puppet and needs to be impeached.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    31,367
    113
    North Central
    @DeadeyeChrista'sdad posted this in another thread, but I wanted to comment here.

    This makes as much sense as taxing unrealized gains.

    “A new tax on money you saved by purchasing something on sale“
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,555
    113
    @DeadeyeChrista'sdad posted this in another thread, but I wanted to comment here.

    This makes as much sense as taxing unrealized gains.

    “A new tax on money you saved by purchasing something on sale“
    Sure that isn't from not the bee?
     

    sairax

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   1   0
    Sep 2, 2024
    62
    18
    Indianapolis
    We got democrats endorsing Trump and Republicans endorsing Harris. It’s a clown show and the end of us may be here sooner than later.
    That's the thing, we'll only know it's the end when it's too late to do anything about it. I mean, back in 2019 the rainbow squad released a song called "we're coming for your children", and in 2022 they were calling for the acceptance of MAPs (Minor Attracted Persons AKA Pedos). Biden chose a drag artist to work with nukes, and the Chinese are now illegally immigrating through Mexico. How much more do we need to call this the end times?
     
    Top Bottom