I agree. But "marxist fascism"? I have never heard that one before. It's a bit of an oxymoron. Fascism was created as an opposition to marxism, yet curiously, with the same sort of flawed reasoning it's remarkably similar in practice. Mussolini's manifesto is a fascinating read.Failing to do a good faith investigation of fraud claims, proclaiming that there I no evidence because you will not allow it to be examined, in order to attain and hold on to power is pretty much classic progressive marxist fascism
I remember yet another of those graphical representations of politics, a ring shape to demonstrate how the extremes tend to become basically the same thing. There's some truth to that. Fascism and Marxism's similarities are pretty evident, it's just that the goals are different and their terminology is different. In Fascism, the state is everything. In Marxism, the state is only a means to an end, and should theoretically fade away when it's no longer necessary.
Normal "enlightenment" thinking is that the state is only necessary to enforce rights. It is not everything, and people should be skeptical of it.
If your side had wanted to avoid 1/6, they could have done that examination of evidence instead of stonewall. I don't think your side wanted to avoid 1/6, I think they wanted to guarantee it
The irregularities were there in 2020 and again last week, to overlook that is willful blindness
When you watch your side's defense interfere with their receiver, you're like, no, that was a clean play. Try catching the ball next time.
Or, hey, that tight-end held our linebacker! Where's the flag? These refs just want the other team to win.
When the other side admits they were part of a cabal to thwart your guy's reelection, I think you have a good reason to believe you were cheated.
And why the **** does it take so long to count this ****? Why were there so many malfunctions, and why do the malfunctions seem to help one side more than the other? If it were random, and I'm not saying it isn't. But if it is random, wouldn't who it benefits be random? I think it's reasonable for people to distrust elections because over the past several years, there have been many reasons on display to distrust them.