Illegal to play live music in Indiana without a permit from IN Homeland Security

[hornadylnl]

How is that possible? There are laws against this. And government inspectors.

Not possible.

They should require DOT inspectors in all auto manufacturers. The line workers might forget to install brakes or even an engine.

While we're at it, lets require quarterly vehicle inspections for all vehicles on the road. Drivers cut corners on proper vehicle maintenance. We can't have their missiles careening down the road hitting mini vans with baby on board signs.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Thanks for posting the video from Mr. Martin, ram. That helps a lot.

Bureaucratic Creep, attempting to expand the definition of the statute a la DNR, or any other governmental agency.

I hope the ALJ puts the smackdown on them, if not off to Circuit Court.

 

[steveh_131]

They should require DOT inspectors in all auto manufacturers. The line workers might forget to install brakes or even an engine.

While we're at it, lets require quarterly vehicle inspections for all vehicles on the road. Drivers cut corners on proper vehicle maintenance. We can't have their missiles careening down the road hitting mini vans with baby on board signs.

You do not have the right to a beautiful car accident.

 

[steveh_131]

Should firearms be inspected before they are carried in public? What about holsters? They can be dangerous when people are irresponsible with them. And perhaps some mental examinations would be in order for license holders. And, of course, a background check. I believe in liberty, but I expect to be able to walk around in public with confidence that dangerous people aren't carrying firearms.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

They should require DOT inspectors in all auto manufacturers.

We tried that here. Did not work out so well.

 

[hornadylnl]

We tried that here. Did not work out so well.

So government fire inspections work but government vehicle inspections don't? Why?

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Good question. Don't know, but vehicles inspections here did not last statewide (talk to our members in Porter and Lake about inspections).

 

[hornadylnl]

Good question. Don't know, but vehicles inspections here did not last statewide (talk to our members in Porter and Lake about inspections).

It's all about the safety of others. We need them back.

 

[rambone]

Should firearms be inspected before they are carried in public? What about holsters? They can be dangerous when people are irresponsible with them. And perhaps some mental examinations would be in order for license holders. And, of course, a background check. I believe in liberty, but I expect to be able to walk around in public with confidence that dangerous people aren't carrying firearms.

The free market has been a miserable failure at stopping irresponsible gun owners.

 

[hornadylnl]

We speed bump marshals now to ensure they don't pose a danger to the public.

Woman awarded $775K after tripping at Nev. casino

 

[BigBoxaJunk]

So government fire inspections work but government vehicle inspections don't? Why?

When I first started driving, I knew a guy who knew a guy, and I got my inspection sticker without anyone even looking at my car.

 

[hornadylnl]

When I first started driving, I knew a guy who knew a guy, and I got my inspection sticker without anyone even looking at my car.

Nothing like that would ever happen with fire inspections though.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

It's all about the safety of others. We need them back.

They are back for some of us on INGO.

Talk to the General Assembly if you desire to reimpose them statewide. It is certainly constitutional but policy is another matter.

 

[hornadylnl]

They are back for some of us on INGO.

Talk to the General Assembly if you desire to reimpose them statewide. It is certainly constitutional but policy is another matter.

I figured you'd be leading the charge on this grave public danger. You can't endanger others with your jalopywookiesmith.

 

[hornadylnl]

This sign was going to kill someone til the gov stepped in. 8 code violations.

Man jailed for refusing to turn off neon anti-Romney sign
Steven Showers, who erected the 14-foot sign last August in front of his Newbury Park, Calif., home was recently convicted of eight misdemeanor zoning code violations for the display.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

I figured you'd be leading the charge on this grave public danger. You can't endanger others with your jalopywookiesmith.

Endanger the public? You mean like this tonight while you were typing:

3 killed in Indianapolis camp bus crash, officials say | Fox News

I wonder if inspections will be an issue in the litigation? Cheer up, horn, you have some blood on the highway for your reinstituting the state auto inspection push!

 

[Kirk Freeman]

This sign was going to kill someone til the gov stepped in. 8 code violations.

Hey, your article is dated July 2d and his contempt hearing was July 15th.

So, what happened?

 

[Kirk Freeman]

I wonder if anyone associated with the bus crash in Indianapolis tonight will say anything about the owners of the bus having a duty of care?

Yes. You leave. If the venue falsely advertised the number of people that would be in attendance, you have a legitimate claim to get your money back.

Maybe the passengers will get their money back? Despite their open and obvious neglect to inspect the bus before getting on it.

Well, maybe in the insurance company lawyers are lucky there will be an INGO-heavy jury pool.

 

[hornadylnl]

Endanger the public? You mean like this tonight while you were typing:

3 killed in Indianapolis camp bus crash, officials say | Fox News

I wonder if inspections will be an issue in the litigation? Cheer up, horn, you have some blood on the highway for your reinstituting the state auto inspection push!

I'm not cheerful for any tradgedies occurring on the roads. Just pointing out your selective pro regulation bent.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

I'm not cheerful for any tradgedies occurring on the roads. Just pointing out your selective pro regulation bent.

Some regulations make sense, others do not. Some make sense to protect our rights, some do not. Some are better served via private contract, some are better served by affecting the culture of society.

Regulations on property are not per se unconstitutional (may be takings, may be arbitrary and capricious, inter alia).

However, one thing is very clear, the rule of law insists on a duty of care and one does have a duty to others. To deny so is to enter the world of science fiction and the rule of man, a dangerous and tyrannical place to be.