We really need to have an emergency alert system for this kind of thread. I can't believe I missed it for two days. Entertainment like this is hard to find.
Lazy posters that put up difficult to read posts NEED to be schooled. It is rude to make readers have to work to understand intent. Rude behavior that is tolerated will get worse and spread making it a huge chore to cypher through the chicken scratching.
Spelling and grammar do not matter near as much as making content legible. No paragraphs, no caps, no punctuation all make for junk that is being asked to be read. Simple software included in most browsers will solve most issues. Combine that with a quick proof read and you are good to go.
There are quite a few prolific posters here who started with txt posting who have "been learned."
I'm really hoping the OP sticks around to contribute to INGO! I'd love to hear his intentions?
I guess hillbilly41 is gone...
No person shall engage in the business of...dealing in firearms, ...until he has...received a license to do so from the Attorney General...
(21) The term "engaged in the business" means -
(C) as applied to a dealer in firearms, as defined in section 921(a)(11)(A), a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms;...
To make out the crime under the statute it was incumbent upon the Government to prove the status of the defendant as a "dealer" in firearms. In order to satisfy this burden the Government need not prove that the defendant's primary business was dealing in firearms or that he necessarily made a profit from such dealing; "it must (however) show a willingness (on the defendant's part) to deal, a profit motive, and a greater degree of activity than occasional sales by a hobbyist." [citation omitted]. The Government may do this by showing that the defendant "had guns on hand or (was) ready and able to procure them and sell them to such persons as might accept them as customers." [citations omitted]. The bulk of the conversations between the defendant and the undercover agents was thus relevant in establishing the defendant's status as a dealer by showing that the defendant had a supply of guns... which he had sold to other customers and which he was willing then to sell to the undercover agents.
I guess hillbilly41 is gone...
Posting in this thread is like poking at a dead carcass with a stick just to see how dead it is. Believe me, I could smell this with my browser turned off!
The guys got fourteen post, none of which are to the rep pyramid, but yet has three gold stars. WHO IS GIVING HIM REP POINTS!!!
... I hope everyone got the ego boost they were looking for.
I like peach Snapple.
Kinda like acting high and mighty, eh?