Because it would be taking money from the state to prop up something that obviously cannot support itself.
Do not start a business that is not capable of making money
are you saying the zoo doesnt make money? because i would beg to differ
Because it would be taking money from the state to prop up something that obviously cannot support itself.
Do not start a business that is not capable of making money
are you saying the zoo doesnt make money? because i would beg to differ
Not saying anything of the sort, but if you have a business that is making money why would you need the governments help
oh ok i gotchya! i misunderstood your post!
That's quite naive to say. Just because you're willing and able to accept government funds to help your business grow doesn't put your business in a bad light nor does it mean that your business isn't capable of running on it's own.Because it would be taking money from the state to prop up something that obviously cannot support itself.
Do not start a business that is not capable of making money
That's quite naive to say. Just because you're willing and able to accept government funds to help your business grow doesn't put your business in a bad light nor does it mean that your business isn't capable of running on it's own.
For example, my business has been in business for nearly 5 years now, growing 300% year over year, but that wouldn't mean that I'm not willing to accept additional funding from outside sources. The only kind of funding I won't accept is the "strings attached" kind (i.e. money for part ownership, etc).
I'm happy to accept free money, you're welcome to "donate to my cause" .So as a business owner you just want FREE money?
Indy Zoo also chooses to pay more for "green" energy which irritates me. They want me to donate but choose ways to voluntarily make their expenses higher
Maybe the Court Date is the precursor event for it....OK, everyone... the court date is DECEMBER 10, 2012. That gives the judge 11 days to make a ruling before the end of the world. Mark the date, folks.
Maybe the Court Date is the precursor event for it....
Then we could accuse T_F of bringing on the apocalypse.
Hold on just a damn minute! I've met Ben and done a bike ride with him. He's a fine gentleman who doesn't deserve to have his name smeared. But now that I think about it he probably could do all that weird stuff. Yeah, I take it all back. He definitely needs to be watched. I mean, like, look what gas prices are doing. Ask yourself, where they that high BEFORE he pulled his little publicity stunt at the zoo? I think not. Sorry, fellas. You may continue your bashing.Poor Ben......
Wait, wasn't he already accused of that? I mean his OCing at the Zoo was supposedly caused cats and dogs living together, women and children stampeded, cattle raped, mass hysteria, etc.
OK, everyone... the court date is DECEMBER 10, 2012. That gives the judge 11 days to make a ruling before the end of the world. Mark the date, folks.
Yes, they make expenses higher, but it's a zoo that is actively involved in world conservation. If you're as involved as they supposedly are, why would you elect to use energy that pollutes or contaminates the environment?
Sounds like the wheels turned a little bit. Thanks for the update. Carry on.***UPDATE***
Sorry to get this back on track fellas but Mrs_Frost and I just got finished with our depositions. Depositions for the 4 officers and Zoo personnel will be scheduled later this week. Thanks for the support!
Hopefully, they will roll over those responsible for this mess.KG1;2867646[B said:]Sounds like the wheels turned a little bit. [/B]Thanks for the update. Carry on.
Frosty, what does that mean next? Are the statements then shared with the attorneys for each side so that each side can lambast the other?***UPDATE***
Sorry to get this back on track fellas but Mrs_Frost and I just got finished with our depositions. Depositions for the 4 officers and Zoo personnel will be scheduled later this week. Thanks for the support!