Wait, I thought Trump was supposed to prevent this sort of thing.
I didn't realize that the U.S. was the only country that was part of the so-called "treaty" with Iran. So they bear no responsibility for monitoring Iran's activities?
Wait, I thought Trump was supposed to prevent this sort of thing.
Wait, I thought Trump was supposed to prevent this sort of thing.
Accurate surface detonation of a W88
Either a WWII "tall boy" or earthquake bomb, courtesy of Barnes Wallis.
Just out of curiosity, which does more damage to deep underground facilities, nuclear or those big bunker-buster type bombs? Or maybe something else? I don't know about these things..
Robust yield in a small package is very much dependent on precise geometric relationship of the parts, might be difficult to obtain reliability of the payload in the high-G environment of penetration of deep earth or re-inforced structure
W88 is 475 kilotons and can be placed practically on an installation's door step. Ground burst likely to do the trick through direct seismic impact and compromise of any ground based systems such as air intakes and ingress/egress systems
Being buried deep underground without much air is a reasonable substitute for a direct kill
I wonder if we've loaned Israel any of these W88's? Or maybe they have their own substitute of equal effectiveness. I can't believe they'll let Iran achieve full weapons-ready status. What do you think the ramifications would be if Israel were to 'modify' Iran's nuclear ambitions?
.
Looks as though President Trump could be the wild card. Attacking Iran may be the means of quieting down the political attacks here at home because after all, what is his offense to the king makers except not going along with the agenda of the Shrub/Soetoro regimes?
....and dropping all those old surplus bombs is a hell of a lot cheaper than dismantling them.
We're currently buying new as there is no more surplus. We've been dropping them since DS1 and they all went boom.