So, first, I think I've come across on INGO today as more aggro than usual. I don't think I actually am, but I'll apologize in advance if I'm coming across that way. I don't mean to be confrontational today. Well, no more than usual.
Of course, to the extent there was actual protection of pedophile/rapist priest so that they could continue their pedo/rapist activities, that's morally reprehensible (<-- understatement) and criminally sanctionable. Let's take that out of this conversation. That was rare, IMHO, if it happened at all.
For some proportion, an example from a different context might be helpful. I know of a local coach for a prominent sport who is a complete jerk to his athletes. Like, emotional and even physical abuse. To the extent of even threatened litigation that was resolved confidentially. Even with that, it is commonly known that the guy is a complete d-bag. But, he tends to win. He "voluntarily" left one school, took a year or so off, then was hired by another school. When the rumors started that he was being hired, some people familiar with the situation expressed concerns, which were left unheeded. "Second chances," "not so bad," "just strong willed." We'll see what happens in the long run, because so far there haven't been an issues (that I know of).
Some obvious differences there - like at least some in the larger community know about this guy. But, because of relationships and a desire to "do the right thing" for the guy, certain decisions were made.
Please don't read this as a defense - I don't intend it that way. It is an explanation for how some well-intentioned people can get drawn into doing things that later seem like REALLY bad judgment.
