CCW shoots armed attacker

[2A_Tom]

Is 9mm really up to almost a dollar a round?


I hate auto correct!

 

[GIJEW]

Sadly, as I understand it, in OH, it is incumbent on the shooter in an SDS to prove his innocence. Not upon the State to prove his guilt.

Kirk, school us on what an "affirmative defense" is

 

[dusty88]

Is 9mm really up to almost a dollar a round?


I hate auto correct!

It depends what kind of 9mm ammo. I pay about 20 cents per round for my practice ammo, but do pay nearly $1 per round for the ammo I carry (I practice with a bit of course, but in very low volume).

 

[chipbennett]

It depends what kind of 9mm ammo. I pay about 20 cents per round for my practice ammo, but do pay nearly $1 per round for the ammo I carry (I practice with a bit of course, but in very low volume).

Yep. Hornaday Critical Defense 9mm (what I carry) is almost a dollar a round.

 

[WebSnyper]

A douche bag criminal that decided to ply his trade over a pair of shoes. Some rob banks, some don't think quite as big.

Don't get me wrong, I have no sympathy for the deceased. He was old enough to understand the stakes involved and what can happen when you pull a gun on someone. He decided those shoes were worth taking the risk.

Some die for their country, some die for love or honor. This idiot died for a pair of shoes.

No, he died because he sought to prey on someone who was not as weak as he thought they were. He died because he put a gun in someone's face who was more well trained, more determined to not be a victim than than he was to have those shoes.

He did not die over a pair of shoes. He died because he sought to do harm to another. Doesn't matter if it was a pair of shoes, a wallet, or a million dollars. The reason he died was not the object he sought to take.

 

[John Galt]

No, he died because he sought to prey on someone who was not as weak as he thought they were. He died because he put a gun in someone's face who was more well trained, more determined to not be a victim than than he was to have those shoes.

He did not die over a pair of shoes. He died because he sought to do harm to another. Doesn't matter if it was a pair of shoes, a wallet, or a million dollars. The reason he died was not the object he sought to take.

INGO haiku poetry right there ....

 

[hoosierdoc]

I had no idea they still made those shoes.

Something like 40% of all basketball shoes sold are Jordan's.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Something like 40% of all basketball shoes sold are Jordan's.

My lack of fashion sense is further exposed.

 

[drillsgt]

Something like 40% of all basketball shoes sold are Jordan's.

Maybe the liberals ought to start a campaign to ban Jordan's?

 

[yote hunter]

Makes me smile to read this stuff it just needs to happen more often .... I get so sick of hearing young people think they can do this type of crap and get away with it... The parents should be held accountable after words because the OP had to shoot there child.... Damn kids these days !

 

[DFM914]

This thug didn't lose his life over a pair of shoes. He lost his life because he was a douche bag criminal.

Well said.

 

[rhino]

I've never owned a pair of Air Jordans. Do they make them in size 11 EEEEE?

 

[2A_Tom]

I've never owned a pair of Air Jordans. Do they make them in size 11 EEEEE?

That would be a special edition. You could be convicted of shooting by a "baited" victim.

 

[Doug]

I've never owned a pair of Air Jordans. Do they make them in size 11 EEEEE?

Suddenly, I'm reminded of Earl Butz.
I guess I'm old.

 

[2A_Tom]

Is that Bertha's brother.

 

[sharkey]

Suddenly, I'm reminded of Earl Butz.
I guess I'm old.

You must be. When I saw the EEEEE, several INGO-inappropriate (more so than gunman41mag!) actresses came to mind.