Okay, I'll buy that explanation. it seemed a littel deeper than that, but I won't quibble.
But that doesn't answer the question why the OP obtained a Indiana LTCH if he wasn't concerned with laws he didn't think were legal.
No, I don't think civil disobedience was on the OPs mind when he chose to carry in Ohio, at least no more than the speeder is engaging in it by driving fast to get from point A to point B.
civil disobedience
[SIZE=-1]NOUN:[/SIZE]
Refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change in governmental policy or legislation, characterized by the use of passive resistance or other nonviolent means.
Yes, it is a little deeper than that, I was just simplifying.
I am assuming he obtained the Indiana one out of convenience. It is probably the least restrictive and easiest gun license/permit that one can obtain, other than Alaska I think (no permit/license necessary from what I hear).
Right, I concur that he was "disobedient" but I do not believe that he did so "in an effort to induce change in governmental policy or legislation" and as such his actions do not meet the accepted definition of the term "civil disobedience".