Would that be "Darwinism" at it's finest?
Yep, I'm for it.
That is the best point made so far. Those who could not control themselves would eventually weed themselves out.
Pun was not intended
Would that be "Darwinism" at it's finest?
Yep, I'm for it.
That is the best point made so far. Those who could not control themselves would eventually weed themselves out.
Pun was not intended
I never said that. Also show me one "burn out" that ONLY uses pot.
.
You obviously have never been around any constant pot smokers.
Heh, "high on life". Life is my hallucinogen. People generalize from what they've experienced, and what they've seen in others. The thing is, each person's reaction to each chemical is very individual. Addiction is a lot more complex than even the "experts" will let on. You can talk to heroin users that'll tell you it's easier to give up heroin than cigarettes, then you can find people that have no apparent addiction to cigarettes. There's even a name for them, "chippers". I don't want someone having an acid flashback while he's driving my kid's school bus, so maybe there's room for some restrictions, but if he's not actually "under the influence" of something it often comes down to people trying to win the lawsuit lottery. "Ooh, pothead! Sue!"