- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
So the little dweeb supports the party that ordered the internment camps and is upst that Thomas doesn't support the party of Jim Crow....
Who cares?
If it were somebody actually famous, at least I could understand why some people might take notice... but for a person, that every time his name is mentioned, they have to also remind us for why he's famous...who cares X 2.
Yeah. I had to google him to remember who ie was. Yep. Was. Past tense.
I would feel the need to separate this into a couple of different thoughts:
First is the actual fame. Although I enjoyed his acting, that doesn't change the fact that he has not done much but collect royalties from the Star Trek franchise for decades and has largely been forgotten.
Second is this misguided notion that entertainers merit having their opinions held as superior to anyone else's. What gives anyone the idea that just because someone is well known by virtue of being able to act or sing that he or she know anything about governance, morals, ethics, or general right and proper more so than any other random person? I don't call the plumber for legal advice, so why would I rely on a actor to tell me how the law should work?