2016 Presidential debate debate

[Mark-DuCo]

I have to admit, I think Johnson locked up my vote last night.

 

[seedubs1]

 

[ATM]

Stop it with your logic!

Logic still nags and haunts me even when I try really hard to ignore it.

Making a run at a true third party would guarantee democrats win forever, because their voters will vote Democrat no matter how bad things get or who the nominee is.

Forever, or just until the collapse? Can't prop this thing up on theft and hollow promises forever.

Don't worry, America will survive. The U.S.... not so much.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Here we go again.

There are some tenets of a particular party that certain people find totally unacceptable. It in no way makes them ignorant, politically or otherwise.

Says you.

 

[ATM]

It might if the third party ran an electable candidate.

Unpossible. Third party candidates are by common definition unelectable.

They can't win even before they are chosen so it makes no difference who they pick to run.

 

[BStarkey 46947]

Somebody should tell The Donald, "sometimes the less you say the more intelligent you sound."

 

[hoosierdoc]

The same could be said for Republicans. The only people that matter, are those who listen and don't blindly vote one party. When people tell me they've never voted for a (insert party), I know how politically ignorant they are.

Repubs less likely to. Again, look at Perot.

 

[indiucky]

Let's not shame people for voting with their conscience and morals. It doesn't jive well with being pro-freedom and pro-constitution.

Correct, either of those two will likely be the winner. But I, also, want no part in that. I feel just fine abstaining from these awful people in Indiana.

I am a backer of Donald J Trump...And I approve this message...

GP isn't throwing away his vote..He is exercising his right as a US citizen to vote in a manner that is comfortable with.....INGO, of all places should support him in this endeavor...

IMHO of course....

 

[T.Lex]

Repubs less likely to. Again, look at Perot.

This cycle makes it more likely that legacy-Republicans will look elsewhere for a candidate to support.

 

[seedubs1]

Exactly. At this point, the Republican party is imploding. Time to jump ship and get something else kicked off.

This cycle makes it more likely that legacy-Republicans will look elsewhere for a candidate to support.

 

[bobzilla]

I am a backer of Donald J Trump...And I approve this message...

GP isn't throwing away his vote..He is exercising his right as a US citizen to vote in a manner that is comfortable with.....INGO, of all places should support him in this endeavor...

IMHO of course....

You get out of here with that namby pamby tolerance and logic crap. It's not welcome here.

But, I too will not vote for either main political party for hte head office of the republic. I will vote on someone that I can sleep at night knowing I didn't actively contribute to the stupidity these two current morons are promoting.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

I am a backer of Donald J Trump...And I approve this message...

GP isn't throwing away his vote..He is exercising his right as a US citizen to vote in a manner that is comfortable with.....INGO, of all places should support him in this endeavor...

IMHO of course....

Thanks.

If it mattered in Indiana, I might think a bit differently. But the fervent hardcores in Indiana that are pushing for Trump, and trying to marginalize and belittle those that don't follow along are absolutely ridiculous. Even after being explained how the EC works. There's no need for the anger at people that don't buy what he's selling. "But Hillary" is not an excuse that can be used with honesty in Indiana.

 

[bobzilla]

This is so appropriate for this election cycle... I cannot like this enough.

 

[hoosierdoc]

Replace three of those faces with Hillary's Supreme Court pics and will you still like it?

 

[seedubs1]

cuz Trump will find the best people. believe me. he'll find them with the best words. his nominations are gunna be yuuuuuuuge.

Replace three of those faces with Hillary's Supreme Court pics and will you still like it?

 

[ATM]

This is so appropriate for this election cycle... I cannot like this enough.

Agreed. IT'S GOT ELECTROLYTES!

 

[Kutnupe14]

Replace three of those faces with Hillary's Supreme Court pics and will you still like it?

Replace it with Trump pics, and ask if you still like it. Trump is going to put picks on the court that care about rights. He's going to put picks that care about or could benefit his and cronies businesses. Out best bet, is to choose the right guys to challenge either one's obviously unsatisfactory (to us) choosings.

 

[seedubs1]

it's what plants crave

Agreed. IT'S GOT ELECTROLYTES!

 

[bobzilla]

Replace three of those faces with Hillary's Supreme Court pics and will you still like it?

I think you're jus trying hard to be pedantic and pissed off at the world. Obviously this is a scene from the documentary "Idiocracy" that has been edited with new subtitles showing the current situation. IT's called comedy. You should look into it a little. Might help your demeanor a bit.

 

[hoosierdoc]

Really? He released the list of people he would nominate from, I don't recall the media slamming the list for cronyism. I remember them being surprised at the solid list of candidates.

hillary has said nothing but we can assume she loves kagan and sotomoyer (sp?). She will pick people 50 years old and guaranteed to do as much harm to the constitution as possible.

on that note, I'm sad trump didn't interrupt her when she said she likes our democracy. I yelled "we're a republic" and shot the screen with a nerf dart

Replace it with Trump pics, and ask if you still like it. Trump is going to put picks on the court that care about rights. He's going to put picks that care about or could benefit his and cronies businesses. Out best bet, is to choose the right guys to challenge either one's obviously unsatisfactory (to us) choosings.