"We're going to take a 15 minute break, Miss Jaental. Do you know how many that is? You'll have to use your fingers and toes."
"Now, if you do the math here... and don't worry, I'll do it for you... because we don't have all day."
No child left behind? My ass. This woman is an imbicile.
This entire thing is about people getting dug into their positions. At first, I had no problem thinking Zimmerman was guilty of manslaughter. Evidence changed that.
Unfortunately, not everyone cares about evidence. There are some disgustingly, vehement people out there right now praising Martin as 100% innocent. They can't let their side go, so... that's why this case has so much attention.
Ideally "justice" will prevail and Zimmerman will get off of these charges.
What did she say "T" called "Z" a wise A$$ Cracker. The defence attorney asked her if she thought this to be a Racist statement and she said What and he repeated and she said "NO"
attorney said "Really"
Her testimony revolved around "Z" being racially motivated in killing "T"
Are we the only ones that see the deal here.
I guess we are all wise A$$ crackers now and that is OK.
How is this guy not convicted yet?
How is this guy not convicted yet?
What did she say "T" called "Z" a wise A$$ Cracker.
I believe he was called a "creepy as cracker".
Originally Posted by yagoob219
How is this guy not convicted yet?
WHAT>>>>>REALLY.......................
WHAT>>>>>REALLY.......................
Welcome to INGO?
Many INGOers use purple text when they post sarcasm. This is because it's often hard to tell if an off the wall comment is just being sarcastic, or is really off the wall.
If sarcasm wasn't intended, well, I guess the OP has a comrade.
I think we have a run for the border with this one guys. He's been pretty active with short comments in other threads as well.I hope he meant acquitted in place of convicted.
I hope he meant acquitted in place of convicted.
To quote our future prez "What difference does it make?"
Exactly.
Back when this thread started, I agreed with Kut. The narrative the media played all day, every day, was about a vigilante mall ninja type killing some innocent little kid.
But then more facts came out that invalidated most of that narrative. And you're right. Some people realized they were fed a bunch of **** and changed their position to match the more likely reality. And some other people obstinately clung to their original belief. Maybe it's because the the original narrative was a much more delicious morsel to them than what the evidence most supports.
It's been my experience no facts or logic can convince people like that of anything.
"We're going to take a 15 minute break, Miss Jaental. Do you know how many that is? You'll have to use your fingers and toes."
"Now, if you do the math here... and don't worry, I'll do it for you... because we don't have all day."
No child left behind? My ass. This woman is an imbicile.
Watching da loyer axe her quesshuns wus like watching sumbody kik a kid in a weelchair , ruuf an rong .
Speaking of people that are "dug in" to their opinion
‘Ima kill me a cracka’: Death threats against George Zimmerman, random white people explode during trial | Twitchy
Good god.