17 year old kid shot dead by Neighborhood Watch "Captain"

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    In Z's case, his gun was not presented prior to being on the ground and getting his head bashed into the concrete.

    For Z to have waited til he felt like his life was slipping to draw a gun, I seriously doubt he egged T into a fist fight.

    I will agree with Fargo that we don't know that this is what happened, but I do believe the onus is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that this did NOT happen if they want a conviction.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,269
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I will agree with Fargo that we don't know that this is what happened, but I do believe the onus is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that this did NOT happen if they want a conviction.

    Ideally yes. But if the evidence justifies Zimmerman, I hope the jury has the courage to call it that way.
     

    Smokepole

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 21, 2011
    1,586
    63
    Southern Hamilton County
    I will agree with Fargo that we don't know that this is what happened, but I do believe the onus is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that this did NOT happen if they want a conviction.

    In our justice system it should be. And the difficulty in accomplishing this, to me would seem to be all the reason not to charge murder. Unless Florida is a state that allows the jury to find guilt of a lesser charge.
     

    Fargo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Mar 11, 2009
    7,575
    63
    In a state of acute Pork-i-docis
    Ideally yes. But if the evidence justifies Zimmerman, I hope the jury has the courage to call it that way.

    Actually, once he asserts self-defense and make his prima facia showing, the state actually has to prove evidence showing that he wasn't justified.

    I know it is a seemingly small distinction, but it is actually quite significant. Basically, at that point Z is presumed justified based upon a minimal showing and the state has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was not.

    This is a very difficult evidentiary burden, not only do you have to overcome a presumption to a BRD standard, you also have to prove a negative.

    I just don't see how it is done in this case. Granted, Z gave them some decent ammo via the cursing in the 911 call and possibly by being truth-deficient in his bond hearing, but I still don't see how they can meet the burden.

    Best,

    Joe
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    One thing is for certain. If Z is found not guilty it's the LA riots all over again.

    It may well be, but if we allow this to sway the administration of justice (i.e., deciding a trial by outside pressure rather than fact established by evidence) we have resigned ourselves to mob rule.
     

    No2rdame

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 8, 2012
    1,637
    38
    Noblesville
    It may well be, but if we allow this to sway the administration of justice (i.e., deciding a trial by outside pressure rather than fact established by evidence) we have resigned ourselves to mob rule.

    Agreed. I was more or less lamenting the fact that the media and the president have both stirred the pot on this issue so much that regardless of their decision the jury may be swayed in part by the repercussions of said decision.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Agreed. I was more or less lamenting the fact that the media and the president have both stirred the pot on this issue so much that regardless of their decision the jury may be swayed in part by the repercussions of said decision.

    We can always hope that there are 12 honest and knowledgeable jurors in Florida!
     

    griffin

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 30, 2011
    2,064
    36
    Okemos, MI
    His injuries were far from life threatening.

    He could have been knocked unconscious at any moment. Then he would be at the mercy of the assailant. Also, if memory serves, didn't Z's gun become visible during the fight, and he saw that Trayvon noticed it and was, or he was afraid he was, going to go after it?
     

    griffin

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 30, 2011
    2,064
    36
    Okemos, MI

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,269
    113
    Gtown-ish
    His injuries were far from life threatening.

    He could have been knocked unconscious at any moment. Then he would be at the mercy of the assailant. Also, if memory serves, didn't Z's gun become visible during the fight, and he saw that Trayvon noticed it and was, or he was afraid he was, going to go after it?

    We don't know if T ever saw the gun. That's Z's word. But we do know that T was on top of Z beating the **** out of him. Maybe the injuries that were treated weren't life threatening, but had Z not shot T, could easily have been.
     

    ultra...good

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 30, 2012
    1,372
    83
    Follow-up story.

    Zimmerman prosecutor withheld evidence

    A prosecutor and the Judicial Circuit Information Technology Director hid evidence against Trayvon Martin in an effort to illegally strengthen their case. The IT Director also deleted text messages from Trayvon to prevent the defense from seeing them. He has been placed on leave (probably paid leave).

    ORLANDO, Fla.: Lawyer: Zimmerman prosecutor withheld evidence - Trayvon Martin - MiamiHerald.com

    Whatever happened to those working in the legal profession doing so to seek truth and justice? Looks like now it is "do whatever you have to do" to win the case.
    For all my years it has been about doing the next right thing, honesty, etc. All I see now is lies, manipulation, do what you have to do to get what you want. Has it always been like this and I am just starting to realize it?
     

    chraland51

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    May 31, 2009
    1,096
    38
    Camby Area
    The prosecution with probably much help from the DOJ is doing everything they can to get a guilty verdict against Zimmerman. I just hope that the defense does not lay down on the the job if Zimmerman is really innocent of the charges. We all know that should Zimmerman be found not guilty, the racial divide in this country will widen more than it already is. It is almost a given that there will be rioting, looting and even killings in the name of Trayvon. There were actually some black on white killings after Trayvon's death that got almost no coverage in the lamestream media. I only heard about them when I was vacationing down south and not on the national news. I will probably start taking advantage of the rights provided by my lifetime license to carry when I have to come into Indy. I was not there and I only know what I hear and read about what supposedly happened. Justice needs to be done no matter what the outcome. Those that do not like the verdict, whatever it might be, will either have to just live with or suffer the consequences of their resultant actions.
     

    Fargo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Mar 11, 2009
    7,575
    63
    In a state of acute Pork-i-docis
    We don't know if T ever saw the gun. That's Z's word. But we do know that T was on top of Z beating the **** out of him. Maybe the injuries that were treated weren't life threatening, but had Z not shot T, could easily have been.

    How do we know who was on top? No one beside's Z says they KNOW.

    As a person who firmly believes that Z should not have been filed on and that absent some super-secret-surprise evidence he cannot be proven guilty, I find it amusing how I apparently do not meet the INGO purity quotient on this because I have the temerity to suggest that we might not KNOW what happened and that MAYBE Z might not be being completely forthright.

    What level of Z worship/T hate would you all find acceptable? Must I actually bear Z's children? Must I pronounce all those who fight at school and smoke weed deserving of death?

    I mean c'mon, really? Do I have to drink ALL the kool-aid?

    Joe
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom