It is so lunatic on INGO now that I am defending wearing warm clothing when it is cold.
If anyone thinks that they can abuse a child by not treating disease or dog bites, or the parents lying around stoned all day or not providing warm clothing or food for your children, you are in for a rude awakening when you grow up.
I can't speak for anybody else but isn't there a line that gets crossed when somebody is intentionally or through criminal neglect abuses their child and when a children's hospital takes custody of a child because there's a disagreement over whether the child has mitacondreal (sp?) disease (eg. Justina Pelletera)? There are extremes. And I realize it's internet 101 to argue points by rolling out extremes to point out the weaknesses of the other persons' arguments. But it seems reasonable to me we ought to expect the .gov to butt out except in dire, extreme, and emergency situations.