Here's my question. "Why" does this appear to a more frequent occurance in the US vs other first world nations? Do we have more wackos per capita? Is it ease of access to firearms? Is it a stupid populace?
What is the best way to prevent this from happening so frequently?
Edit: Signs statewide still carry no weight of law. What you referenced is basically the trespassing law. If asked to leave private property, you must. They've added an unenforceable amendment about signage.
It appears to be a more frequent occurrence because we have a relatively open media that reports and reports and reports all sorts of unpleasant stuff, if only to push its political agendas.Here's my question. "Why" does this appear to a more frequent occurance in the US vs other first world nations? Do we have more wackos per capita? Is it ease of access to firearms? Is it a stupid populace?
What is the best way to prevent this from happening so frequently?
I don't know anything of the kind.Here's my question. "Why" does this appear to a more frequent occurance in the US vs other first world nations? Do we have more wackos per capita? Is it ease of access to firearms? Is it a stupid populace?
What is the best way to prevent this from happening so frequently?
It appears to be a more frequent occurrence because we have a relatively open media that reports and reports and reports all sorts of unpleasant stuff, if only to push its political agendas.
(Can you imagine if the media attacked the 4th and 5th Amendments to the same degree. Michael Bloomberg calling for an end to the warrant requirement, that citizens have a duty to incriminate themselves?)
America violent? I was under the impression that the UK has a much higher violent crime rate than the US. But it's better because the criminals don't tend to use guns, and if you resist them you get prosecuted. All the gun control folks would love it there.
Hey, now!!!give a monkey a gun and it'll shoot everything and itself.
Oh they use guns in China too, but you won't hear about it in the US media.Their criminals use guns. Especially gang members. Australia and Britain both had gun massacres in the 80-90's...and used them to Make guns illegal. They still have criminals with guns though. And even Britain had the shotgun taxi murderer several years ago, while most guns were illegal (not shotguns though).
In China guns are banned and they have mass knife attacks, like Ninjas they are, without guns, but just as deadly.
Regardless of the armchair quarterbacking and the bravado Denny mentioned...
I still have to think there'd have been a difference if (for example) an INGO meetup would have been at the Carmike instead of the Golden Corral, and this had unfolded.
I'd have to believe it would be a "Somebody picked the wrong diner" deal...
!
Oh they use guns in China too, but you won't hear about it in the US media.
I worry that in the aftermath of this event we will get some more excellent laws just like the ones Congress passed after 9/11. I don't have much faith in the ability of people to think carefully about ceding more rights in exchange for 'safety'.
Unfortunately, you're probably right. We, as humans, have a tendency to react irrationally. When something happens, we have a tendency to think about what could have stopped that particular attack if people followed laws. They never work how their intended though. Look at Colombine. Guns are illegal on school property, didn't stop either shooter or the kid in Martinsville. There will never be a violence free society and until people get that engrained into their heads, they'll keep crying for more laws or stricter laws.
I guarantee an assault weapons ban is being written right now...
VP Biden already has a draft.