Nope, not yet. But they are closing the gap fast. That's why we have to constantly move forward. That's also why we must demand the military make the best use of the budget dollars they are allocated, and deal with waste and fraud with the seriousness it deserves. I understand it is easy to say...
I second that Amen. I plan to have enough to help out many others, but you can't save everyone. I also pray that I will never have to make those kind of choices.
This^^^
Look at the makeup of the group. They are all Old guard Washington career politicians. Never mind that the formation of the group is unconstitutional to begin with. This group has the very real potential to circumvent our Constitution and be used in some very bad ways.:noway:
Interesting read. Hopefully we won't have to find out if he is right or not, but I fear that we will. I do take exception with the "have-nots" vs "haves" designation. This implies that the "have-nots" are somehow disadvantaged and the "haves" somehow have been lucky or greedy in obtaining what...
This is one of those questions that you can't really answer until you are in the situation. Personally, I can't think of many scenarios that get better with me arming someone who didn't think to arm themselves beforehand. However, I will have several additional firearms for those living with me...