The danger I see here is the isolation of an unpopular group being used to establish a very dangerous precedent. I will, for the sake of rules and a pleasant discussion with all regardless of their faith or lack thereof, say that there is a reason why our founders were clear that the republic was suitable only for a morally just people, and this is a prime example. If people cannot regulate themselves, particularly regarding voting themselves money and/or advantage, there must be a counterbalancing force either in form of government or informal means. Barring that, the system destabilized exactly as it is doing right now leaving us to ask whether we will end up with a far less free society or the problem will be corrected, well, informally.
So far as I am concerned, felons who are no longer in prison should have all their rights. There is no asterisk in the Constitution with an exception for them and through the combination of it becoming accepted to demote them to a second-class citizenship and the constant criminalization of more and more activities, some of which were recognized as rights by generations past, we have a very dangerous door opening. I will also say that allowing deadbeats to vote themselves money is a danger to the republic as we were warned by its architects, but then again, mass disenfranchisement has plenty of danger of unintended consequences well beyond the prevention of multigenerational welfare dependents voting themselves more of our money. What happens when a minority acts on the realization that they pay the majority of the tax revenue and rather than demanding a more equal system of taxation demand a share of control proportionate to the taxes they pay? At that point, we have rediscovered serfdom, including for the majority of us who do indeed pay our taxes but are not in the top tax bracket.
There is no question that people who make a way of life out of gaming the system are like cockroaches, but then again it is important to remember that burning the house down will get rid of them, but it doesn't do much to improve our standard of living. Likewise, this problem needs cured, but destroying the foundation of the free republic isn't the way to do it. Never hand the government a club to use on someone else that you wouldn't want used on yourself.
Good points, Dave. I tend to agree with Prometheus' sentiments though I agree with that that total disenfranchisement of certain classes of people may be a price too high. I agree with Franklin that the most compassionate thing we can do is make the poor uncomfortable in their situation. Then through their own ingenuity find a way to support themselves.
Social Security and Medicare has been an ingenious enslavement system. As a disclaimer, it does not appear to be in the cards for me to become independently wealthy, so, in time, I'll place myself into "the system". As a freedom loving people, one that is insulted when the .gov mandates what we must or mustn't do, it's amazing that the vast majority are quite comfortable and even conditioned to the .gov telling us we must surrender a portion of our salaries for our old-age. And since most all of us are willing participants in this system and we expect to get our fair share back when it's our turn, we'll vote people in that promise to protect this system and throw those out that won't.