This is such a valid point. You pull the trigger, you put him down. I realize that it's no laughing matter after taking a life, but you obviously had to defend yourself once. Aiming with the intent to wound is only going to leave room for sharks to pick apart your scenario.
I know from experience, that a wound to an extremity is not going to stop me from my objective. My
We have two threads right now covering similar themes, so, I'm copy/pasting my reply from the other since it applies here:
A point here about wounding vs killing, since it was brought up.
Using a firearm in defense is DEADLY FORCE. Legally, your intentions cease to matter once you press the trigger.
I'm not sure why so many fail to see this when they understand why they are shooting someone in the first place. When you are defending yourself with a gun it is because you felt a threat of death or grave bodily harm - the person attacking you is doing so with lethal force (gun, knife, other weapon, or even their size or fighting skills can justify shooting.) If they point a gun at you and make a threat, the law sees it as a lethal threat because of the potential the gun has. So, the law looks at our guns no different - when we point them at people, we are presenting lethal force, and when we shoot them, we are inflicting deadly force.
Why is this? Because no one can predict the damage a bullet will do.
You can attempt and arm or leg shot, but clipping an artery will kill.
Lethal force is lethal force. However, our motivation is never to kill a VCA [Violent Criminal Actor], it is to stop them. We are stopping their behavior with force because it is necessary that we do so NOW, and because hesitation, or a lesser means, will result in a greater injury or loss of innocent life.
You only shoot at people when lethal force is justified, and when you shoot them you do your level best to shoot them in a manner which will offer the highest probability of a cessation of their actions.
Attempting to shoot with charity is not only a contradiction, it's a great way to find yourself dead.
if close def. a head shot. but most likely the chest. with a .45 hollow point, your going down. always, and i mean always shoot twice.
WRONG...... due some homework your not always going down with 45
there was a recent cases n which an Off duty officer was shot 5 times with a 45 once in the face 4 in the ab and chest and leg he one the fight with a 9mm
another involved a Georgia shooting in which a task force shot the suspect in the head/face with a ump 45 firing golden sabers he lived the round pearced the left side of his face and exited behind his ear
another case was an new orleans officer attacked and shot his attacker 5 rounds of 45 then another in the face while they kept fighting an passer by shot the suspect in the head contact shot and killed him.... dont mistake a wonder caliber for a stopper because its 45 or any other
I practice triple tap. 2 in the chest and 1 in the head. I cant say for certain thats what I would do in the heat of the moment, but its what I practice.
Sources? Claims without sources are like screen doors on submarines.
Also, grammar and punctuation? It would be a heck of a lot easier to read if you would slow down and take a moment to write according to the rules you learned in grade school. Please?
yes that was very true......
also heard of others along that line up ma ny refuse to believe that we have seen 45,9mm 308 223 and 12 gauge slugs deflect off baseball cap brims any whom have ahd randy cains class has seen this
http://www.lawofficer.com/news-and-articles/articles/lom/0412/the_peter_soulis_incident.html
"Remarkably, Palmer had taken 22 hits from Soulis' .40-caliber Glock, 17 of which had hit center mass. Despite the fact that the weapon had been loaded with Ranger SXTs—considered by many to be one of the best man-stoppers available—Palmer lived for more than four minutes after the last shot was fired. His autopsy revealed nothing more than a small amount of alcohol in his bloodstream."