Trump 2024 — The second term

[Ingomike]

Off the top of my head (and what I can remember from multiple people who went to law school)

Misdemeanor outside statute of limitations. State has no authority to bring federal charges. FEC didn't pursue charges.

Prosecution's star witnesses: An unhinged former porn star who owes DJT close to $500K in legal fees and a rare individual who has lied under oath to all three branches of the government/bitter ex-employee at own admission.

Bill of Rights:

1st Amendment (Gag order applied only to DJT)

5th Amendment (can't remember but Dershowitz keeps bringing it up and he's been a lawyer 60 years. Maybe due process since this is more Stalin than SCOTUS)

6th Amendment (call witnesses in your defense, unanimity in the verdict, be informed of the nature of the accusations)

Prosecution's opening statement: (brought up offenses there were never any charges)

Prosecution's closing filibuster: (5 hours long and was allowed to bring in false statements about campaign law violations which is false.)

The Judge: (conflicted under NY law due to daughter's work with a dem consulting firm and the money being made. That's 1 degree, not 6 per NY law. Statistically incredibly improbable the same judge {who is NOT in the 24 judge rotating panel} would also catch the case involving Steve Bannon and one other IIRC.) Violated 1st Amendment rights of defense witness {per Alan Dershowitz: eye-rolling is protected.} Jury instructions allowed 6th Amendment violation {pick and choose any crime you can think of... and that's unanimous} and this is just off the top of my head.)

"Fat Alvin" Bragg: NYC is turning to complete **** and this guy has much of the responsibility. He loves POS criminals and locks up a bodego owner for self-defense and a former Marine for protecting others. Ran on "get Trump"... very Berian.

Former #3 at DoJ is one of the local prosecutors... WTF?

Jury: out of a population who voted 90-10 for Biden. If any would've caused a hung jury their home would've burned and they would be unemployed. (If you think that's hyperbolic? Look at what has happened since 2020.) Also see quote in my sig line from juror on the Derek Chauvin trail. Saint George died of a fentanyl overdose and the Doc who testified to that? Does he still have a license?

Well summed up!

 

[Ingomike]

Surely you remember those conversations. Don't you? You guys talk about playing the same game they do, or to that affect. I say, nah. We don't have to sink to the same depths. You claim I want to play by Marquis of Queensbury rules.

So I press you on it. Just what do you mean by that? What are you saying we should be willing to do exactly? So then you list things that aren't actually breaking any rules. Then why the claims about Marquis of Queensbury rules, if you're not actually advocating things that would break them?

So I have a couple choices how I could have interpreted that. Either a) you're blowing off steam with that "do what they do" shtick and didn't really mean it. Or b) you really meant it, but didn't want to admit on a public forum the things you think conservatives should do to fight as dirty as progressives do. I let it go because that seemed to be the end of the Marquis of Queensbury nonsense. But. Maybe I should ask. Which was it, a or b?

So you didn’t find anything to post. Got it.

 

[NyleRN]

I'll say that this country is under judgment. And I'm not certain that this is even considered birthing pains yet. But I do know it's going to get a lot worse

 

[Magyars]

 

[Magyars]

⁰

 

[Route 45]

 

[LeftyGunner]

I mean…that sounds pretty good to me.

Prosecute Clinton? **** yeah…long overdue.

Prosecute Obama, Biden, Pelosi, AOC…whoever? Sure…go for it.

I don‘t view prosecuting politicians for their crimes as a bad thing…I sincerely hope we see much more of this type of thing.

Trump’s prosecution does more to drain the swamp than his presidency ever could.

 

[Ingomike]

Could you explain those Trump crimes to us since top nonpartisan legal scholars were not able to do so?

Do you consider this a fair trial according to the constitution?

 

[Ingomike]

For a clear explanation of what is next this is details the possibility and probability…

Trump is Convicted: What Comes Next?

This morning, many of us are emerging from the late coverage last night after the conviction of former President Donald Trump on 34 felonies. I was in the courtroom for the verdict, which hit like …

jonathanturley.org

 

[Route 45]

I don‘t view prosecuting politicians for their crimes as a bad thing…I sincerely hope we see much more of this type of thing.

 

[Ingomike]

So I press you on it. Just what do you mean by that? What are you saying we should be willing to do exactly? So then you list things that aren't actually breaking any rules. Then why the claims about Marquis of Queensbury rules, if you're not actually advocating things that would break them?

Republicans Should Do To Democrats What They Did To Trump

Either you’re willing to jail Democrats on the same terms they’re using to jail Trump, or you’re merely controlled opposition.

thefederalist.com

 

[jwamplerusa]

We don't have the stones to play their game. If we did, Biden would have been impeached 3x by now.

No, he shouldn't have been impeached, he should have been charged with treason along with much of his staff within weeks of the Afghanistan withdrawal.

Many States including Indiana have a treason clause within their constitution. The fact that no red state attorney general has allied with other red state attorney generals to make a charge of treason against Joe Biden, Mayorkas, and a host of others proves the Republic is gone.

 

[Route 45]

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I’m getting texts now to join in.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

 

[Ingomike]

Mark Levin’s Legal Advice for Trump Is Spot On

pjmedia.com

 

[daddyusmaximus]

Mark Levin’s Legal Advice for Trump Is Spot On

pjmedia.com

Probably his only real recourse right now.

 

[DadSmith]

Edit: time.
Go to 1:38:30 it starts around that time

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

 

[Route 45]