What is this?! No love for the m&p series?! I have a full size 9mm pro series. That gun is phenomenal. Only have about 600 rounds through it but not a single malfunction yet
Although this argument is pretty ridiculous given the wide variety of excellent options out there, I am going to say the USP. The torture tests that it this particular series of handguns have excelled in are pretty impressive.
Depends what you intend by "tough" - are you talking about parts breakage or disablement of the weapon?
Striker fired pistols tend to be less prone to environmental factors, because they do not rely on external mechanisms. A little mud under a cocked hammer can slow it enough to prevent firing until you clear it out with a utencil.
Well, considering that lead and double charged rounds through any semi automatic weapon isn't very healthy for it...............Kabooms ain't just limited to the Glock.
1. Beretta 92f/s / M9 (proven track record, simplicity of design and dissasembly)
2. Sig 226/229 (Proven track record like beretta, but recoil spring needs replacing more often than the beretta. Also more comlicated to dissasemble.)
3. XD/M&P/Glock (they are all equal in reliability imo, choice would be by user comfort.(I prefer a M&P))
4. HK USP. (Dont have that much experience with it personally, but i have shot one and loved it, and all reviews seem to be very good. HK makes a quality product)
5. Browning Hi-Power (Classic, Proven Design. As much as i like 1911's, the Hi-power design is probably superior)
Sig P226 is by far my favorite pistol, maybe a Ruger P90. Let's face it those old Rugers were overbuilt and weigh a ton. I'll never sell mine for sure.
Personally I think the XD's, M&P's and Glocks are all equally reliable, but the XD's fit my hand the best; therefore they are the most reliable to me as I shoot them the best.